The tuples branch is now in a state where code generation kind of
works well enough that it's possible to do some limited testing.
There are three big components that are still not totally functional:
EH lowering, OpenMP and mudflap. Aldy is finishing OpenMP and I will
be debugging the EH problems
NightStrike wrote:
What is gcc's irc server?
#gcc on irc.oftc.net
On 2/9/08, Diego Novillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> contribute. You can get guidance by posting your questions here or on IRC.
What is gcc's irc server?
On Mon, 11 Feb 2008, Ben Elliston wrote:
>> You don't really need approval to work on GCC. Just make sure you can
>> contribute. You can get guidance by posting your questions here or on
>> IRC.
> Tom, if you are going to make significant code contributions to GCC,
> make sure you have your copy
> You don't really need approval to work on GCC. Just make sure you can
> contribute. You can get guidance by posting your questions here or on
> IRC.
Tom, if you are going to make significant code contributions to GCC,
make sure you have your copyright assignment in place with the FSF.
Cheers
On Sat, 9 Feb 2008, H.J. Lu wrote:
> My testsuite are also bounced. Is there a problem?
>
> H.J.
> On Feb 9, 2008 6:12 AM, Jack Howarth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>Is anyone else having their gcc testresults rejected by
>> the mail server as containing elements that appear to be
>> spam?
Yep
Hallo,
When the recent GCC compiler is very slow compiling projects or packages then
many people refuse to follow recompiling updated versions of projects,
few people tend to test each time less the updated versions, there are
less beta testers and finally less detection of unknown bugs .
Where G
