Re: [RFC/RFT] Improving SMS by data dependence export

Hi Alexander, > We would like to ask people interested in SMS performance on PowerPC and > Cell SPU to conduct tests with this patch. Any feedback is greatly > appreciated. I intend to perform testing with this patch (on ppc and SPU), after resolving the miscompilation issues mentioned above.

Re: Git and GCC

> > Where did have you read this ? I missed that part. > > > When you object > > that he's wasting your time, he'll start talking about freedom of speech. > > > > Actually he never spoke like that (probably I missed that part too). > > Read gcc mailing list archives, if you have a lot of time on

Re: gnat1 huge time

Having observed the bug while building a native, SJLJ version of libgnat on x86_64, I have filed PR ada/34400 for this. -- Ludovic Brenta.

Re: VLIW scheduling and delayed branch

> Has anyone faced a similar problem before? Are there targets for which > both VLIW and DBR are enabled? Perhaps ia64? I did something similar a few months ago. The problem is that haifa and the delayed branch scheduling passes don't really fit together. delayed branch scheduling happily undoes

Re: Git and GCC

On Dec 8, 2007 8:53 PM, Joe Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Mr. Pizarro has endless ideas, and he'll give you some new ones every day. That's true. > He thinks that no one else knows any computer science, and he will attempt > to teach you what he knows, It's not the only one ;-) is in good

Re: The Regents of the University of California BSD-license in GPLed GCC.

On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 12:31:43PM +0100, J.C. Pizarro wrote: > In GPLed GCC-4.1 branch appears a notice of BSD license > gcc/config/i386/gmon-sol2.c > > * Copyright (c) 1991 The Regents of the University of California. > * All rights reserved. And why are you sending this to both gcc and gcc-h

Re: Git and GCC

On Sat, 8 Dec 2007, J.C. Pizarro wrote: > > 1. "Don't compress this repo but compact this uncompressed repo > > using minimal spanning forest and deltas" > > 2. "After, compress this whole repo with LZMA (e.g. 48MiB) from 7zip > > before > > burning it to DVD for backup reasons or

Re: The Regents of the University of California BSD-license in GPLed GCC.

J.C. Pizarro wrote: In GPLed GCC-4.1 branch appears a notice of BSD license gcc/config/i386/gmon-sol2.c * Copyright (c) 1991 The Regents of the University of California. * All rights reserved. No doubt. And in the mean time I'm listening to: Title: Bach: Prelude and Fugue in C, BWV 531

VLIW scheduling and delayed branch

Hi, I am trying to enable delayed branch scheduling on our port of Gcc for picochip (16-bit VLIW DSP). I understand that delayed-branch is run as a seperate pass after the DFA scheduling is done. We basically depend on the TImode set on the cycle-start instructions to decide what instructions

Re: Git and GCC

Hi, On Sat, 8 Dec 2007, J.C. Pizarro wrote: > On 2007/12/07, "Linus Torvalds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > SHA1 is almost totally insignificant on x86. It hardly shows up. But > > we have a good optimized version there. > > If SHA1 is slow then why dont he contribute adding Haval160 (3 roun

Re: Git and GCC

Hi, On Fri, 7 Dec 2007, Daniel Berlin wrote: > On 12/7/07, Giovanni Bajo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 14:14 -0800, Jakub Narebski wrote: > > > > > > >> Is SHA a significant portion of the compute during these > > > > >> repacks? I should run oprofile... > > > > > SHA1 is

The Regents of the University of California BSD-license in GPLed GCC.

In GPLed GCC-4.1 branch appears a notice of BSD license gcc/config/i386/gmon-sol2.c * Copyright (c) 1991 The Regents of the University of California. * All rights reserved. ... J.C.Pizarro sincerely ;)