On Mon, 2007-10-22 at 00:07 +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
> If you really want all externally-visible accesses to v to be made exactly
> as the code directs, rather than allowing gcc to optimise them in any way that
> (from the program's POV) it's just the same 'as-if' they had been done
> exactly, m
On Sun, 2007-10-21 at 20:16 +0400, Tomash Brechko wrote:
> But if C99 is thread-neutral, then it's compiler's responsibility to
> ensure the same result as some abstract machine
No. The compiler is responsible for ensuring that things work
if, and only if:
1. your program conforms in required
On 10/21/07, Rene Buergel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When i'm trying to compile the following Code:
> method = &X::some_func;
You forgot the template keyword as X is dependent :
method = &X::template some_func;
There is a defect report against the C++ standard about X being
depende
When i'm trying to compile the following Code:
template class X
{
private:
typedef void (X::*PtrToMethod)();
PtrToMethod method;
template void some_func()
{
return;
}
public:
void func()
{
method = &X::some_func
On 21 October 2007 15:55, Tomash Brechko wrote:
> Consider this piece of code:
>
> extern int v;
>
> void
> f(int set_v)
> {
> if (set_v)
> v = 1;
> }
> f:
> pushl %ebp
> movl%esp, %ebp
> cmpl$0, 8(%ebp)
>
On 10/21/07, Tomash Brechko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 21, 2007 at 17:26:02 +0200, Erik Trulsson wrote:
> > Note that C99 is firmly based on a single-threaded execution model and says
> > nothing whatsoever about what should happen or not happen in a threaded
> > environment. Accordi
On Sun, Oct 21, 2007 at 17:26:02 +0200, Erik Trulsson wrote:
> Note that C99 is firmly based on a single-threaded execution model and says
> nothing whatsoever about what should happen or not happen in a threaded
> environment. According to C99 a C compiler is allowed to generate such code
> as gc
On Sun, Oct 21, 2007 at 06:55:13PM +0400, Tomash Brechko wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a question regarding the thread-safeness of a particular GCC
> optimization. I'm sorry if this was already discussed on the list, if
> so please provide me with the reference to the previous discussion.
>
> Consi
Hello,
I have a question regarding the thread-safeness of a particular GCC
optimization. I'm sorry if this was already discussed on the list, if
so please provide me with the reference to the previous discussion.
Consider this piece of code:
extern int v;
void
f(int set_v)
{
