Snapshot gcc-4.3-20070720 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.3-20070720/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.3 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk
Hello,
> Can you send out your presentation too?
the slides and the example code are at
http://kam.mff.cuni.cz/~rakdver/slides-gcc2007.pdf
http://kam.mff.cuni.cz/~rakdver/diff_reverse.diff
Zdenek
Zdenek,
Can you send out your presentation too?
Thanks,
Harsha
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
>Zdenek Dvorak
>Sent: Friday, July 20, 2007 3:46 PM
>To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
>Subject: Loop optimizations cheatsheet
>
>Hello,
>
>you can find t
Rodolfo Schulz de Lima wrote
> Ling-hua Tseng escreveu:
> > Obviously, {1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7} are not matched.
> > Maybe you think that the item 3 is matched.
> > Unfortunately, it stands for the non-template functions.
>
> Are you sure that it doesn't include template functions? Because I think
> it
Hello,
you can find the cheatsheet I used during my loop optimizations tutorial
on gccsummit at
http://kam.mff.cuni.cz/~rakdver/loopcheat.ps
Zdenek
Please find the summary of the loop optimizations BOF here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/LoopOptimizationsBOF.
We've also updated the Vectorizer Todo wiki page
(http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/VectorizationTasks) and the Loop Optimizations
wiki page (http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/LoopOptTasks).
Thanks to everyone
On 20 July 2007 16:31, Rodolfo Schulz de Lima wrote:
>> Guys, why don't you take this to comp.std.c++ to get an authoritative
>> answer? That's where you'll find the greatest concentration of people who
>> really know what the standard /actually means/ by what it says...
>
> Alright, thread mo
Guys, why don't you take this to comp.std.c++ to get an authoritative
answer? That's where you'll find the greatest concentration of people who
really know what the standard /actually means/ by what it says...
Alright, thread moved to comp.lang.c++.moderated, subject "Overload
resolution wit
On 7/20/07 9:39 AM, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
> http://www.cse.iitb.ac.in/~uday/gcc-workshop/?file=downloads
Thanks. Looks very useful indeed. I've added a link to it from the GCC
Wiki (http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki)
On 20 July 2007 14:57, Rodolfo Schulz de Lima wrote:
> Ling-hua Tseng escreveu:
>> Obviously, {1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7} are not matched.
>> Maybe you think that the item 3 is matched.
>> Unfortunately, it stands for the non-template functions.
>
> Are you sure that it doesn't include template functions?
Ling-hua Tseng escreveu:
Obviously, {1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7} are not matched.
Maybe you think that the item 3 is matched.
Unfortunately, it stands for the non-template functions.
Are you sure that it doesn't include template functions? Because I think
it makes sense to consider them too (as Visual S
Hi,
Based on this morning's announcement by David at the Steering commitee
panel .
Here's the link to the slides online for folks to look at .
http://www.cse.iitb.ac.in/~uday/gcc-workshop/?file=downloads
--
cheers
Ramana
--
Ramana Radhakrishnan
Hi,
I noticed an ICE occuring while libgfortan is build for target
x86_64-pc-mingw32.
/bin/sh ./libtool --mode=compile
/vol/d/source/gcc-rep/gcc/build/./gcc/gfortran
-B/vol/d/source/gcc-rep/gcc/build/./gcc/
-L/vol/d/source/gcc-rep/gcc/build/x86_6
4-pc-mingw32/winsup/mingw
-L/vol/d/source/gcc-
Hi!
I don't seem to be able to apply this patch to 126797 sources (today): I
can wait for now...
Thanks a lot!
Philippe
PS: to be fair I could very well be goofing on my patching... I get:
patching file config/mips/mips.md
Hunk #1 succeeded at 3314 (offset 2 lines).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 3325
Hi!
Thanks a lot for your reply!
I'll try this patch.
Cheers!
Philippe
Richard Sandiford wrote:
>
> Philippe Schaffnit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Yes, I have cleaned-up my sources and all that.
> >
> > Thanks a lot for your reply! I have start to look for the first revision
> > to fail.
Philippe Schaffnit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yes, I have cleaned-up my sources and all that.
>
> Thanks a lot for your reply! I have start to look for the first revision
> to fail...
MIPS is known to be broken at the moment because of:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2007-07/msg00357.html
This
On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 11:35 +0530, Venkatesan Jeevanandam wrote:
> I am getting the below error message while compiling, can u please help me.
> Is there any problem with gcc in backward compatibility?
There are no guarantees about compiling old GCC releases with a more
modern version of GCC. A
Hi!
Yes, I have cleaned-up my sources and all that.
Thanks a lot for your reply! I have start to look for the first revision
to fail...
Philippe
Janne Blomqvist wrote:
>
> On 7/20/07, Philippe Schaffnit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I guess this is more likely to be a general 'Gcc' thing rat
On 7/20/07, Philippe Schaffnit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I guess this is more likely to be a general 'Gcc' thing rather than
GFortran, but I guess you can put me on the right track...
I think so too (crossposting to the gcc list).
Lately my builds under Irix have been failing with:
rm -f st
19 matches
Mail list logo
