2007/4/22, Per Bothner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Without taking a position on the current proposal, using xhtml
for "dump" files has some further advantages:
* Can use hyperlinks, for example from a reference to the declaration,
or from a variable to its type.
* Can use JavaScript to hide/un
On 4/21/07, Mike Stump <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We still have some lno bits in our tree. We tried to remove them and
found:
gzip +0.5%
vpr -0.4%
gcc -3.2%
mcf -0.3%
crafty +0.2%
parser +0.2%
perlbmk -2.2%
gap +0.2%
vortex -0.1%
bzip2 +1.9%
twolf -0.7%
on x86 (probably a core2 duo) in our 4.2
On 4/22/07, Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think it was just by accident that the libfuncs would fit in
phi_node+3 operand slot. Also I think extra_order_size_table needs to
be relooked at after my phi_node and the gimple_stmt patches as I
think we now put have some duplicates and th
Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> We held a GCC mini-summit at Google on Wednesday, April 18. About 40
> people came. This is my very brief summary of what we talked about.
> Corrections and additions very welcome.
Thank you for the summary.
I am disappointed that I wasn't able to attend, as it sounds
Steve Ellcey wrote:
>> It came up in a few side conversations. As I understand it, RMS has
>> decreed that the -On optimizations shall be architecture independent.
>> That said, there are "generic" optimizations which really only apply
>> to a single architecture, so there is some precedent for be
Program za knjigovodstvo sa PDV-om
Ako niste zadovoljni svojim knjigovodstvom?
Ako su Vam pricali da je knjigovodstvo bauk i da to ne moze svako.
Ako mislite da svi oni grese,
U PRAVU STE!!!
Vodite svoje knjigovodstvo lako i jednostavno
sa programom koji smo razvili za Vas!
On Sun, 2007-04-22 at 14:44 +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
> > At work we use -O3 since it gives 5% performance gain against -O2.
> > profile-feedback has many flags and there is no overview of it in the
> > doc IIRC. Who will use it except GCC developpers? Who knows about your
> > advice?
On Sun
On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 12:55:26AM +0300, Dorit Nuzman wrote:
> "H. J. Lu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 23/04/2007 00:29:16:
>
> > On Sun, Apr 22, 2007 at 11:14:20PM +0300, Dorit Nuzman wrote:
> > > "H. J. Lu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 20/04/2007 18:02:09:
> > >
> > > > Hi Dorit,
> > > >
> > >
"H. J. Lu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 23/04/2007 00:29:16:
> On Sun, Apr 22, 2007 at 11:14:20PM +0300, Dorit Nuzman wrote:
> > "H. J. Lu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 20/04/2007 18:02:09:
> >
> > > Hi Dorit,
> > >
> > > SSE4 has vector zero/sign-extensions like:
> > >
> > > (define_insn "sse4_1_
On Sun, Apr 22, 2007 at 11:14:20PM +0300, Dorit Nuzman wrote:
> "H. J. Lu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 20/04/2007 18:02:09:
>
> > Hi Dorit,
> >
> > SSE4 has vector zero/sign-extensions like:
> >
> > (define_insn "sse4_1_zero_extendv2siv2di2"
> > [(set (match_operand:V2DI 0 "register_operand" "=
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Where is gstdint.h ? Does it acctually exist ?
libdecnumber seems to use it.
decimal32|64|128.h's include decNumber.h which includes deccontext.h
which includes gstdint.h
When you configure libdecnumber (e.g. by running top-level gcc
config
On Sun, 2007-04-22 at 15:22 +0200, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > At work we use -O3 since it gives 5% performance gain against -O2.
> > profile-feedback has many flags and there is no overview of it in the
> > doc IIRC. Who will use it except GCC developpers? Who knows about your
> > advice?
>
> Well, th
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Where is gstdint.h ? Does it acctually exist ?
libdecnumber seems to use it.
decimal32|64|128.h's include decNumber.h which includes deccontext.h
which includes gstdint.h
When you configure libdecnumber (e.g. by running top-level gcc configure),
gstdint.h should be
"H. J. Lu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 20/04/2007 18:02:09:
> Hi Dorit,
>
> SSE4 has vector zero/sign-extensions like:
>
> (define_insn "sse4_1_zero_extendv2siv2di2"
> [(set (match_operand:V2DI 0 "register_operand" "=x")
> (zero_extend:V2DI
>(vec_select:V2SI
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Where is gstdint.h ? Does it acctually exist ?
libdecnumber seems to use it.
decimal32|64|128.h's include decNumber.h which includes deccontext.h
which includes gstdint.h
When you configure libdecnumber (e.g. by running top-level gcc
configure), gstdint.h should be
Without taking a position on the current proposal, using xhtml
for "dump" files has some further advantages:
* Can use hyperlinks, for example from a reference to the declaration,
or from a variable to its type.
* Can use JavaScript to hide/unhide sections of the dump.
* Can use CSS to switch b
Where is gstdint.h ? Does it acctually exist ?
libdecnumber seems to use it.
decimal32|64|128.h's include decNumber.h which includes deccontext.h which
includes gstdint.h
If some one who knows, could sort this issue out please.
Many thanks in advance,
Aaron
> On Sun, 2007-04-22 at 14:44 +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
> > On 4/22/07, Laurent GUERBY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > but also does not make anyone actually use the options. Nobody reads
> > > > > the documention. Of course, this is a bit overstatement, but with a
> > > > > few excepti
Hello,
> On Sun, 2007-04-22 at 14:44 +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
> > On 4/22/07, Laurent GUERBY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > but also does not make anyone actually use the options. Nobody reads
> > > > > the documention. Of course, this is a bit overstatement, but with a
> > > > > few
On 4/22/07, Laurent GUERBY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, 2007-04-22 at 14:44 +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On 4/22/07, Laurent GUERBY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > but also does not make anyone actually use the options. Nobody reads
> > > > the documention. Of course, this is a bit
On Sun, 2007-04-22 at 14:44 +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On 4/22/07, Laurent GUERBY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > but also does not make anyone actually use the options. Nobody reads
> > > > the documention. Of course, this is a bit overstatement, but with a
> > > > few exceptions, peopl
On 4/22/07, Laurent GUERBY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > but also does not make anyone actually use the options. Nobody reads
> > the documention. Of course, this is a bit overstatement, but with a
> > few exceptions, people in general do not enable non-default flags.
>
> I don't think this is
hiukan addiktoiva visailu, ite meen numerossa 62,
http://www.saunalahti.fi/willon/visailu
lähetä toki eteepäin :)
> > but also does not make anyone actually use the options. Nobody reads
> > the documention. Of course, this is a bit overstatement, but with a
> > few exceptions, people in general do not enable non-default flags.
>
> I don't think this is fair.
> Most people don't read the docs because they d
> > Look from what we're starting:
> >
> > <<
> > @item -funroll-loops
> > @opindex funroll-loops
> > Unroll loops whose number of iterations can be determined at compile
> > time or upon entry to the loop. @option{-funroll-loops} implies
> > @option{-frerun-cse-after-loop}. This option makes co
> Look from what we're starting:
>
> <<
> @item -funroll-loops
> @opindex funroll-loops
> Unroll loops whose number of iterations can be determined at compile
> time or upon entry to the loop. @option{-funroll-loops} implies
> @option{-frerun-cse-after-loop}. This option makes code larger,
> and
On i686-pc-cygwin, last updated Apr 21 20:55 +0100:
make[2]: Entering directory `/repository/davek/patch-gnu/gcc/obj2'
make[3]: Entering directory `/repository/davek/patch-gnu/gcc/obj2'
rm -f stage_current
make[3]: Leaving directory `/repository/davek/patch-gnu/gcc/obj2'
Comparing stages 2 and
27 matches
Mail list logo
