Re: AC_LIBTOOL_WIN32_DLL for libgfortran

2007-03-10 Thread FX Coudert
In any case, I think efforts would be better spent helping get a modern libtool into the tree, since the one there now is ancient and I wouldn't be surprised if the mingw/cygwin-specific parts have bitrotted from years of neglect. There is effort to get that done, as you can see in the recen

RE: Is "FTZ/DAZ for SSE via fast math" available for x86 arch other than Linux?

2007-03-10 Thread Danny Smith
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Zuxy Meng > Sent: Wednesday, 7 March 2007 12:36 a.m. > > I've uploaded a proposed patch for this bug > (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13151&action=diff). > Putting > crtfastmath.o

Re: AC_LIBTOOL_WIN32_DLL for libgfortran

2007-03-10 Thread Brian Dessent
FX Coudert wrote: > I tried adding AC_LIBTOOL_WIN32_DLL to configure.ac (just before > AM_PROG_LIBTOOL) and -no-undefined to libgfortran_la_LDFLAGS, as is > indicated in the autobook and other online resources. but configure > (on a cross-compiler from i686-linux to i386-pc-mingw32) still says: D

AC_LIBTOOL_WIN32_DLL for libgfortran

2007-03-10 Thread FX Coudert
Hi all, I've been trying to use tweak the libgfortran build machinery to get it generate a libgfortran.dll on windows systems, but I have no luck. I tried adding AC_LIBTOOL_WIN32_DLL to configure.ac (just before AM_PROG_LIBTOOL) and -no-undefined to libgfortran_la_LDFLAGS, as is indicated

Re: symbol names are not created with stdcall syntax: MINGW, (GCC) 4.3.0 20061021

2007-03-10 Thread Tobias Burnus
Ross Ridge wrote: > Danny Smith writes: >> Unless you are planning to use a gfortran dll in a VisualBasic app, I >> can see little reason to change from the default "C" calling convention > > FX Coudert writes: >> That precise reason is, as far as I understand, important for some >> people. Fortran

Re: symbol names are not created with stdcall syntax: MINGW, (GCC) 4.3.0 20061021

2007-03-10 Thread Ross Ridge
Danny Smith writes: >Unless you are planning to use a gfortran dll in a VisualBasic app, I >can see little reason to change from the default "C" calling convention FX Coudert writes: >That precise reason is, as far as I understand, important for some >people. Fortran code is used for internal rout

Re: Quick FUNCTION_MODE doco query

2007-03-10 Thread Paul Brook
> @defmac FUNCTION_MODE > An alias for the machine mode used for memory references to functions > being called, in @code{call} RTL expressions. On most CISC machines, > where an instruction can begin at any byte address, this should be > @code{QImode}; on RISC machines, where all instructions ar

Quick FUNCTION_MODE doco query

2007-03-10 Thread Dave Korn
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gccint/Misc.html#Misc - Macro: FUNCTION_MODE An alias for the machine mode used for memory references to functions being called, in call RTL expressions. On most machines this should be QImode.

Re: Building gcc trunk on Darwin / Intel?

2007-03-10 Thread Mike Stump
On Mar 10, 2007, at 6:43 AM, Mohan Embar wrote: I tried building gcc trunk on Darwin / Intel: /datal/gcc/gcc/gcc/config/i386/darwin.h:244: unterminated comment or string; unexpected EOF You should be able to update and build now... Let us know if not.

Building gcc trunk on Darwin / Intel?

2007-03-10 Thread Mohan Embar
Hi All, I'm new to this and searched Google and the mailing lists a bit before posting this. I'm not subscribed to this list, so I'd appreciate it if whoever answered CCed me directly. I tried building gcc trunk on Darwin / Intel: imac20:/datal/gcc_build mohanembar$ uname -a Darwin imac20.local

Re: symbol names are not created with stdcall syntax: MINGW, (GCC) 4.3.0 20061021

2007-03-10 Thread FX Coudert
IMO, anybody who uses -mrtd (with or without decorations) is asking for trouble. Unless you are planning to use a gfortran dll in a VisualBasic app, I can see little reason to change from the default "C" calling convention. That precise reason is, as far as I understand, important for some