Note that in general we're trying to avoid introducing target dependent
stuff into the gimple/SSA optimizers. We should consider the
vectorization code as the exception rather than the rule for this
kind of thing.
Well, these exceptions are starting to pile up however. Besides ivopts,
which
[ first, this is the wrong list to ask such question, gcc-help is the
right one ]
On Nov 27, 2006, at 7:25 PM, Ulf Magnusson wrote:
How are you supposed to find the canonical name of a system (of
known type) in CPU-Vendor-OS form in the general case?
In the general case, you ask someone tha
How are you supposed to find the canonical name of a system (of known
type) in CPU-Vendor-OS form in the general case? If you have access to
a system of that particular type, you can run config.guess to find
out, but you might not have, and that approach won't work for many
systems anyway. The can
Rask Ingemann Lambertsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Here something has gone wrong, and the parameters to
> subreg_regno_offset() are invalid:
>
> (gdb) frame 1
> #1 0x08504786 in subreg_regno_offset (xregno=9, xmode=HImode, offset=2,
> ymode=HImode) at rtlanal.c:3017
>
>If I take out
On Nov 27, 2006, at 12:49 PM, Brendon Costa wrote:
As a result of C types not having a "class name for linkage
purposes", I
am finding it difficult to define a "normalised" string
Trivially, you can construct the name by composing one based upon the
structure. The is_compatible function th
Andrew Pinski wrote:
> Again C has different rules from C++.
> In C, the following two TUs combined together are still valid code while in
> C++,
> they are invalid.
>
> tu1.c:
>
> struct a
> {
> int t;
> };
> void f(struct a);
>
> cut -
> tu2.c:
>
> type
>
> Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> > C++ defines a notion of "class name for linkage purpose" -- that is a
> > notion used to define the One Definition Rule.
> > In general the TYPE_NAME of TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT is the class name for
> > linkage purpose.
> > The behaviour you reported on implements the
Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> C++ defines a notion of "class name for linkage purpose" -- that is a
> notion used to define the One Definition Rule.
> In general the TYPE_NAME of TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT is the class name for
> linkage purpose.
> The behaviour you reported on implements the rule 7.1.3/5:
>
Andrew Pinski wrote:
Platform is x86_64 (FC6) with trunk r119257
Configured thusly:
../trunk/configure --with-gmp=/usr/local --with-mpfr=/usr/local
--disable-multilib
I am getting this while in stage3 when I bootstrap:
/bin/sh ../../../trunk/libgfortran/mk-kinds-h.sh
'/home/daney/gccsvn/
>
> Platform is x86_64 (FC6) with trunk r119257
>
> Configured thusly:
> ../trunk/configure --with-gmp=/usr/local --with-mpfr=/usr/local
> --disable-multilib
>
> I am getting this while in stage3 when I bootstrap:
>
>
> /bin/sh ../../../trunk/libgfortran/mk-kinds-h.sh
> '/home/daney/gccsvn
Platform is x86_64 (FC6) with trunk r119257
Configured thusly:
../trunk/configure --with-gmp=/usr/local --with-mpfr=/usr/local
--disable-multilib
I am getting this while in stage3 when I bootstrap:
/bin/sh ../../../trunk/libgfortran/mk-kinds-h.sh
'/home/daney/gccsvn/native-trunk/./gcc/gfo
> Markus Franke wrote on 11/27/06 12:50:
>
> > Are there also some other optimisation passes working on the GIMPLE/SSA
> > representation which make use of any machine-dependent features?
> >
> Yes. Passes like vectorization and loop optimizations will use so
> called 'target hooks' which allow th
On Nov 27, 2006, at 7:04 AM, Doug Gregor wrote:
So, here's a variant that might just work: add a flag variable
flag_check_canonical_types. When it's true, we do the complete
structural checking, verify it against the canonical types result, and
warn if they differ. (This is what we do now when
V
On Mon, 2006-11-27 at 13:08 -0500, Diego Novillo wrote:
> Markus Franke wrote on 11/27/06 12:50:
>
> > Are there also some other optimisation passes working on the GIMPLE/SSA
> > representation which make use of any machine-dependent features?
> >
> Yes. Passes like vectorization and loop optimi
Markus Franke wrote on 11/27/06 12:50:
Are there also some other optimisation passes working on the GIMPLE/SSA
representation which make use of any machine-dependent features?
Yes. Passes like vectorization and loop optimizations will use so
called 'target hooks' which allow the high-level pa
Dear GCC Developers,
I am currently trying to get familiar with basic functionalities (and
their implementation) of the GCC (cc1).
After generating the GIMPLE representation of the Input-Parse-Tree a
huge number of optimisation passes takes place. These passes are said to
be hardware independent.
Hi all,
I am currently working on the implementation of division/modulus
assembly libraries for incorporation into my port of gcc (which is
currently a private port, but will be submitted back at some point). I
have run into a few problems that I would appreciate some help with.
My port is f
On 11/22/06, Mike Stump <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ensure if doesn't fall over, if you structure it that way, however,
if instead you just warn:
[snip code using warnings]
or even maybe just a note, it'll make it just a bit safer in the
short term. People can then watch for these messages and
Hi all,
I'm trying to compile gcc 4.1 source (from debian). I need to be able
to compile it because I have to modify and add some code and
recompile. When I try to compile gcc I get the following error
message:
../.././fastjar/fastjar.texi:119: Unknown command `gcctabopt'.
../.././fastjar/fastja
Le Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 11:54:20AM +1100, Ben Elliston écrivait/wrote:
> > I am considering implementing the following feature into GCC using
> > the patch on http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-11/msg01769.html
> > : a compiler probe which permits to probe the run of a compilation,
> > e.g. by
20 matches
Mail list logo
