Bug in Instruction Combination procedure and RTL generation.

Hi all, I'm trying to debug a code optimization in gcc for an specific arch, to be more explicit it's for gcc 2.95.3 for Metaware ARC target architecture, i know the old release of compiler and i know there will not be lot of support about it, anyway im keep on trying..., In other words i notice

Re: Bootstrap broken

On Sun, 3 Sep 2006, Andrew Pinski wrote: > On Mon, 2006-09-04 at 07:14 +0200, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: >> Somehow we still manage to break the bootstrap, even at the end of stage3: > Looks like __used is used by FreeBSD's headers (and not by glibc/Linux's > headers). Bingo! Your nose is a good one,

Re: Bootstrap broken

On Mon, 2006-09-04 at 07:14 +0200, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > Somehow we still manage to break the bootstrap, even at the end of stage3: Looks like __used is used by FreeBSD's headers (and not by glibc/Linux's headers). I forgot where the list of not to be used identifiers are so I cannot check if i

Bootstrap broken

Somehow we still manage to break the bootstrap, even at the end of stage3: /files/pfeifer/OBJ-0902-2308/./gcc/xgcc -shared-libgcc -B/files/pfeifer/OBJ-0902-2308/./gcc -nostdinc++ -L/files/pfeifer/OBJ-0902-2308/i386-unknown-freebsd5.4/libstdc++-v3/src -L/files/pfeifer/OBJ-0902-2308/i386-unknown-

Re: gets is not too dangerous

On Thu, 2006-08-31 at 17:52 -0400, Miguel Angel Champin Catalan wrote: > We are students of computer sciences in the Santa Maria University, > Chile. We just want to know if the function "gets" it's too dangerous > for a warning. The fact is that our teacher's assistant give us a > homework, an

Re: MyGCC and whole program static analysis

On Wednesday 30 August 2006 18:52, Basile STARYNKEVITCH wrote: > Le Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 06:36:19PM +0200, basile écrivait/wrote: > > Maybe some of your are aware of MyGCC http://mygcc.free.fr/ which > > seems to be an extended GCC to add some kind of static analysis. > > > > I'm quite surprised th

Re: GCC 4.3 Projects Page

Daniel Berlin wrote: On 9/1/06, Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Joe Buck wrote: > On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 03:56:30PM -0700, Mark Mitchell wrote: >> Please add your project page to the bottom of: >> >> http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GCC_4.3_Release_Planning > > BTW, that page provides a link

Re: SPEC CPU 2006 and gcc

Florian Weimer wrote: * Toon Moene: Well, I'd like to order, but it is unclear from the online documentation whether I'm eligible for the educational / non-profit price. $ 800 is a bit too much - even for my most prominent hobby. I know someone who has received (or is about to receive) a li

Re: Many new ICEs in the libstdc++-v3 testsuite

Andrew Pinski wrote: On Sat, 2006-09-02 at 20:40 -0700, Andrew Pinski wrote: On Fri, 2006-09-01 at 20:13 -0400, Andrew Pinski wrote: This was caused by: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=rev&revision=116623 And here is one reduced testcase which we just reject now but it is valid

Re: Many new ICEs in the libstdc++-v3 testsuite

On Sat, 2006-09-02 at 20:40 -0700, Andrew Pinski wrote: > On Fri, 2006-09-01 at 20:13 -0400, Andrew Pinski wrote: > > This was caused by: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=rev&revision=116623 > > And here is one reduced testcase which we just reject now but it is > valid code as far as I can tel

Re: SPEC CPU 2006 and gcc

On Sun, 2006-09-03 at 19:26 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Toon Moene: > > > Well, I'd like to order, but it is unclear from the online > > documentation whether I'm eligible for the educational / non-profit > > price. > > > > $ 800 is a bit too much - even for my most prominent hobby. > > I kn

Re: SPEC CPU 2006 and gcc

* Toon Moene: > Well, I'd like to order, but it is unclear from the online > documentation whether I'm eligible for the educational / non-profit > price. > > $ 800 is a bit too much - even for my most prominent hobby. I know someone who has received (or is about to receive) a license he probably

Re: SPEC CPU 2006 and gcc

H. J. Lu wrote: Has anyone tried SPEC CPU 2006 with gcc mainline and 4.1 branch? Well, I'd like to order, but it is unclear from the online documentation whether I'm eligible for the educational / non-profit price. $ 800 is a bit too much - even for my most prominent hobby. Cheers, -- Too

Re: request of copyright assignment form

On Sat, 8 Jul 2006, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > On Fri, 7 Jul 2006, James E Wilson wrote: >> I thought it was the actual legal forms that weren't supposed to be on >> the web site, but that the questionnaire was OK. > I believe I recall we were not supposed to have either, but you raise > a good point.