Jack Howarth wrote:
Eric,
Does the following test fail for you under your x86_64 patch set for
Macintel?
No, but that's because I have a patch to fix it :)
-eric
On 29/08/2006, at 5:27 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
Geoff,
Isn't the gcc.misc-tests/linkage.c failing just because we don't
have
an entry in linkage.exp that defines the native flags for Darwin?
Yes.
Also,
this test look pretty dicey in that it uses...
catch { exec cc -c $native_c
Geoff,
Isn't the gcc.misc-tests/linkage.c failing just because we don't have
an entry in linkage.exp that defines the native flags for Darwin? Also,
this test look pretty dicey in that it uses...
catch { exec cc -c $native_cflags "$srcdir/$subdir/linkage-y.c"
>&/dev/null }
and...
Eric,
Does the following test fail for you under your x86_64 patch set for
Macintel?
Running
/sw/src/fink.build/gcc4-4.1.999-20060828/gcc-4.2-20060828/gcc/testsuite/gcc.misc-tests/linkage.exp
...
Executing on host:
/sw/src/fink.build/gcc4-4.1.999-20060828/darwin_objdir/gcc/xgcc
-B/sw/src/fi
I've posted the results of last night's build of gcc trunk
on my dual G5 using Geoff's TImode patch and changes to
prune.exp to suppress the failures from the ld64 linker
warnings.
Jack
