> > Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 09:46:36 +1200
> > From: Danny Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > From: Mark Kettenis
> > Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2006 9:34 AM
> >
> > > The best thing to do is probably to define
> > > DWARF2_FRAME_REG_OUT to always use the SVR4 register map.
> >
> > Thanks for that a
On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 03:37:33PM -0700, Geoffrey Keating wrote:
> "H. J. Lu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > ld -shared -Bsymbolic will reduce number of dynamic relocations in
> > a shared library. Unfortunately, it won't work correctly with C++
> > exception and maybe other language features.
Snapshot gcc-4.0-20060727 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.0-20060727/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.0 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
"H. J. Lu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ld -shared -Bsymbolic will reduce number of dynamic relocations in
> a shared library. Unfortunately, it won't work correctly with C++
> exception and maybe other language features.
>
> However, I think it is possible to make -shared -Bsymbolic to work
> f
Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Jason Merrill wrote:
> >
> > It seems that you have a different mental model of type visibility.
>
> I've gotten a little lost in this thread. Is there a clear proposal for
> the semantics that we're leaning towards at this point?
>
> One meta-note i
On Jul 27, 2006, at 12:31 AM, Rahul Phalak wrote:
I want to add command line options in GCC for analyzing application
code
for a set of rules.
I agree with Ian for the most part. For research and development,
you will want to give your users lots of control. They will then
give you feed
Hello
My name is Joe Butch and I'm with LocalBuilders.com. Our site is
dedicated to informing the public about local builders as well as
providing the service of locating local builders and general
contractors for anyone in the United States.
We have recently come upon gnu.org and we believe
I've started adding a bunch of regression tests to the
Ada dejagnu testsuite (see below for the current state).
I've accumulated these over several years, and almost all
of them have been reported in gcc bugzilla (not many of
these) or to ACT (the funny package names are ACT tracking
numbers).
How
"Rahul Phalak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Please don't send e-mail to both gcc@gcc.gnu.org and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] This type of e-mail, related to the development
of gcc, is appropriate for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Approach 1:
> Since these options are warning options, I intend to integrate them with
On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 03:51:50PM +0200, Denis Vlasenko wrote:
> ../../gcc-4.1.1/gcc/gthr-posix.h:43:21: error: pthread.h: No such file or
> directory
> ../../gcc-4.1.1/gcc/gthr-posix.h:44:20: error: unistd.h: No such file or
> directory
Please ask on gcc-help or the crossgcc list. This is a F
Hi,
I am building gcc-4.1.1 like this:
$SRC/configure \
--enable-languages="c,c++" \
--disable-nls \
--build=i386-pc-linux-gnu \
--host=i386-pc-linux-gnu\
--target=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 12:56:14PM +0200, Denis Vlasenko wrote:
> does it mean I need a cross-compiler (to x86_64) to use -m64?
> It's strange because then -m64 is not useful at all
> - x86_64 cross compiler defaults to 64 bit anyway... right?
It overrides -m32 earlier on the command line. It's a
I imagine a lot of you gcc people will laugh at me now,
but I finally bought amd64 machine and want
to compile 64-bit Linux kernel.
I am not able to do it. Tracked it down to a simple thing.
My gcc cannot compile any .c file with -m64 flag:
# gcc -m64 -c t.c
t.c:1: sorry, unimplemented: 64-bit mo
Hi All,
I want to add command line options in GCC for analyzing application code
for a set of rules. These options would generate warnings against the
violated rules. I would like to give user provision of analyzing code
for:-
1. Generating warnings for all the rules.
2. Enabling warning only for
14 matches
Mail list logo
