qwangpolestar wrote:
> Hi, David
>
> Thanks a lot.
>
> I am using gcc-3.2.2 and glibc-2.3.2. Maybe it's too old.
> How about yours?
>
I never used anything earlier than 3.3.0 on mips. Basic ffi call support
for mips existed in that version. We added ffi closures in 4.0 IIRC
(although I have back p
> Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | As far as I understand we (GCC) have to develop our own codes
> | independently of glibc unless RMS agrees to have copies/forks of
> | glibc code in GCC (this includes license changes to GPL + libgcc exception
> | like in this case). What is fin
On May 17, 2006, at 4:32 PM, fsshl plinlin wrote:
Union-Souths-Computer:~/Developer/usr/local/bin UnionSouth$ ./gcc
../../../try.cgcc: error trying to exec 'cc1': execvp: No such file or
directory
This list is for developers of gcc. You should be using gcc-help.
FWIW you need more than jus
On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 12:17:33AM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> I noticed that http://gcc.gnu.org/buildstat.html only lists the build
> status of GCC up to 4.0.x. Do you need a volunteer to create a page
> for 4.1.x?
I maintain the GCC build status lists and have gotten way, way behind.
Creat
Union-Souths-Computer:~/Developer/usr/local/bin UnionSouth$ ./gcc
../../../try.cgcc: error trying to exec 'cc1': execvp: No such file or
directory
good question, actually I did not know where is the error too.
to solve by easy, can you just email me a cc binary of (MAC OS X 7.9,
apple G5)yours by email?
I noticed that http://gcc.gnu.org/buildstat.html only lists the build
status of GCC up to 4.0.x. Do you need a volunteer to create a page
for 4.1.x?
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
I am (finally...) starting the 4.1.1 RC1 build.
Please do not check in any changes on the 4.1 branch, even if previous
approved.
Thanks,
--
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(650) 331-3385 x713
Hi Dave,
thanks for your comments.
> Doesn't this mean that your insn patterns should be using numerical (aka
> "matching") constraints?
Oh we are using matching constraints. But of course nobody except reload does
care
about them. If the only constraints for an operand are matching constrain
On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 12:09:00AM +0800, Rémy Saissy wrote:
> To manage the manipulation of the register class, I added entries in
> the i386.md file.
>
> ;; get a value from a segment register.
> (define_insn "store_seg"
> [(set (match_operand:SI 0 "nonimmediate_operand" "")
>(match_o
On 15 May 2006 15:47, Andreas Krebbel wrote:
> [rA + rB] = [rA + rB] & 3;
> 1. SRC rB -> rD
> 2. SRC rA -> RC
> 3. DEST rB -> rD
> 4. DEST rA -> RC
> last 3 changes. If the subsequent call to apply_change_group fails we
> end up with:
>
> [rA + rB] = [rA + rD] & 3;
> Which now could still be i
Richard Guenther wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Following RMS request of removing source copies of other projects I
> asked him if he considers it ok to have copies of the generic math
> transcendentals routines of glibc in libgcc-math and to distribute
> them under GPL + libgcc exception clause license. He de
On May 17, 2006, at 1:06 AM, Eric Fisher wrote:
Does gcc support Simple Chinese language for now? Is there anyone
working on this?
I think you'll want to talk with the GNU translation project, they do
all of this stuff, we just add whatever they do to gcc.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 01:11:54PM +0200, Mohamed Boukaa wrote:
> --->Also when I compile a simple program by myself I got :
>
> ~ $ ./testaz
> bash: ./testaz: Permission denied
> However the portage is working fine , it can compile C
王 启 wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am building the cross-toolchain for mipsel on x86 redhat pc. Now I can
> build the gcc for c using following configuration. ./configure
> --prefix=/opt/xuelian-toolchain/mipsel-linux-glibc --target=mipsel-linux
> --enable-shared --enable-threads --enable-languages=c
> --
Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
| As far as I understand we (GCC) have to develop our own codes
| independently of glibc unless RMS agrees to have copies/forks of
| glibc code in GCC (this includes license changes to GPL + libgcc exception
| like in this case). What is fine a
On Wed, 17 May 2006, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Hi,
> |
> | Following RMS request of removing source copies of other projects I
> | asked him if he considers it ok to have copies of the generic math
> | transcendentals routines of glibc in libgcc
Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Hi,
|
| Following RMS request of removing source copies of other projects I
| asked him if he considers it ok to have copies of the generic math
| transcendentals routines of glibc in libgcc-math and to distribute
| them under GPL + libgcc exception
Diego Novillo wrote on 05/01/06 12:07:
> The x86 box that runs SPEC2000 daily has hardware problems.
>
It's now working again.
http://people.redhat.com/dnovillo/spec2000.i686/gcc/
Hi,
Following RMS request of removing source copies of other projects I
asked him if he considers it ok to have copies of the generic math
transcendentals routines of glibc in libgcc-math and to distribute
them under GPL + libgcc exception clause license. He denied that
request and so, after doin
hi,
Does gcc support Simple Chinese language for now? Is there anyone
working on this?
Thanks.
On May 16, 2006, at 7:39 PM, fsshl plinlin wrote:
Dear gcc and/or apple OS X 7.9 users:
Union-Souths-Computer:~/gcc-5250 UnionSouth$ cat config.log
This file contains any messages produced by compilers while
running configure, to aid debugging if configure makes a mistake.
configure:595: chec
22 matches
Mail list logo
