>
> On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 01:56:21AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > Since they are assembly codes, it sounds like a gcc driver issue to me.
> >
> > Might be. The way the assembly is built is a bit funky because it's a
> > shared library.
>
> It is a gcc bug
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh
On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 01:56:21AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > Since they are assembly codes, it sounds like a gcc driver issue to me.
>
> Might be. The way the assembly is built is a bit funky because it's a
> shared library.
It is a gcc bug
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27253
Snapshot gcc-4.1-20060421 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.1-20060421/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.1 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
It seems that toolchain relocation, especially for
crossed-native builds, seems to be broken in mainline
while it used to work for earlier releases. The situation
seems particularly bad for Windows (MinGW).
I build GCC regularly only on Linu
On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 02:42:49PM +0200, Christian Joensson wrote:
> hmm, I am uncertain again. The testresults available at
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2006-04/msg01133.html indicate
> that this is indeed a TLS problem. From the log file of the libgomp
> testsuite (with the -m64 switc
On 4/21/06, Gerald Pfeifer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Apr 2006, Christian Joensson wrote:
> >> /usr/bin/ld: .libs/barrier.o: check_relocs: unhandled reloc type 0
> >> .libs/barrier.o: could not read symbols: File format not recognized
> >> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
> >>
> >>
On 21 April 2006 01:10, Alan Modra wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 04:52:14PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
>> Yet it would seem to me at first glance that, since dividing unsigned by
>> an exact power-of-2 can be optimised to a right shift, and since we can
>> deduce
>
> You might like to build yo
On 20 April 2006 18:28, Kimmo Fredriksson wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Apr 2006, Dave Korn wrote:
>
>>
>> Hello, gcc-hackers!
>>
>> This is somewhat chopped-down from the original code it began life as, but
>> it serves to illustrate the point.
>>
>> unsigned int PhyFrameConfig (unsigned int channel
On 4/21/06, Arnaud Charlet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It's that time again... I just want to ask if there's any progress on
> > Ada being multilibbed?
>
> Are you working on it perhaps ?
I'm sorry to say, no...
--
Cheers,
/ChJ
> It's that time again... I just want to ask if there's any progress on
> Ada being multilibbed?
Are you working on it perhaps ?
Arno
10 matches
Mail list logo
