Possible configure problem in mainline?

2006-04-15 Thread Bradley Lucier
I'm trying to build a 64-bit mainline compiler on powerpc-darwin; I want gcc to generate 32-bit binaries by default, I just want cc1, etc., to be 64-bit binaries so I can compile large files. This works in 4.1, but not on mainline. This is reported at http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cg

gcc-4.2-20060415 is now available

2006-04-15 Thread gccadmin
Snapshot gcc-4.2-20060415 is now available on ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.2-20060415/ and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.2 SVN branch with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk

Re: A question about tree-ssa-structalias.h.

2006-04-15 Thread Daniel Berlin
On Apr 13, 2006, at 8:21 AM, Diego Novillo wrote: either remove the line or convert it to VEC somehow. Remove it. It's now done with NUM_REFERENCES which just uses common.aux. Dan probably forgot to remove it when he converted it. Guilty as charged. I usually let "unused variable " war

make bootstrap results: gcc 4.0.3, i686-pc-cygwin (Microsoft Windows XP Professional SP2)

2006-04-15 Thread Kimitsuna Ura
$ cd ~/archives/gcc/src/gcc-4.0.3 $ ./config.guess i686-pc-cygwin $ /usr/local/bin/gcc -v Using built-in specs. Target: i686-pc-cygwin Configured with: /home/gob/archives/gcc/src/gcc-4.0.3/configure --enable-languages=c++ --enable-win32-registry Thread model: single gcc version 4.0.3 $ What I

Re: Toolchain relocation

2006-04-15 Thread Ranjit Mathew
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dave Murphy wrote: > Ranjit Mathew wrote: >> >> However, when I moved the binaries to another machine >> where MinGW was installed in "D:\MinGW", the compiler was >> not able to find the C runtime headers, even though the >> folder structure was exactl

Re: Toolchain relocation

2006-04-15 Thread Dave Murphy
H. J. Lu wrote: It may be related to http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14435 Can you try http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-01/msg01757.html Tried that but no difference. I had a look through gcc.c and noticed that standard_exec_prefix and standard_libexec_prefix are constants