Why does gcc put initialized data in .data section and uninitialized data in
bss section? Does it provide any optimization? Also, normally gcc
initializes global data to zero then what kinds of data go to .bass section?
An example would be appreciated.
Regards,
Mohanlal
P.S. - Please CC repli
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I subscribe to the "RecentEdits" RSS feed of the GCC
Wiki. Of late, there have been a lot of "AddComment Plug-in"
entries in the feed, with no apparent way of finding out which
entry in the Wiki the comment refers to, and many filled
with bog
Hi! This promotion made me think of you. Sign up and we can both get
the new iPod nano!
http://plogfile.com/?r=QRFUMzUicCExB2oIACYJ&tc=21&i=gmail&z=1
Talk to you soon!
On Mar 25, 2006, at 4:08 AM, Gaius Mulley wrote:
What do you folks need me to do? Presumably bring gm2 up to the
latest gcc cvs with its regression test suite working etc?
Yup, basically, submit a patch against mainline that meets our
requirements and ask for approval.
Roughly, all isolat
On Mar 27, 2006, at 2:29 AM, Nicolas Roche wrote:
I just saw that I sent this email to the wrong mailing list. So I
reforward to gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Careful; on some systems name it _main. But on others, you don't
want _main.
Well it works even in that case as my test was done on Mingw wich
> Also, in which branch should I port these modifications (4.2,
> 4.1,...) to submit a patch? I originally developed the whole stuff
> on a tree-ssa branch dating January 2004, and then ported it to
> 4.0.1. Porting this to any recent branch should be easy, but which
> one to choose?
If you want
On Mar 25, 2006, at 9:14 PM, Camm Maguire wrote:
Greetings! GCL is a lisp compiler system which outputs C code normally
compiled by gcc into an object, which is then loaded and relocated
into the running GCL image. In lisp, compiling is a very incremental
process, with many, often thousands of s
Hi Jeff,
On Monday 27 March 2006 21:00, Jeffrey A Law wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-03-25 at 10:35 -0500, Diego Novillo wrote:
>
> > Start by looking at tree-vrp.c:infer_value_range.
> I'm not so sure this is the best place to start.
it seems a good place for adding ASSERT_EXPRs on function return
value
On 3/27/06, David Edelsohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am not sure why the copyright clerk forwarded this to the
> general GCC mailinglist instead of helping you obtain an assignment form,
> but we can proceed anyway.
I don't mind :-)
> Do you work for any university or compan
I am not sure why the copyright clerk forwarded this to the
general GCC mailinglist instead of helping you obtain an assignment form,
but we can proceed anyway.
Do you work for any university or company that could claim
ownership of your code? If no, you directly can assign your c
Hi,
During the last two years, I developed a gcc pass called tree-check
that performs user-defined checks on the tree (GIMPLE) form of a
function.
The checks are specified using a new option --tree-check, and are
powerful enough to express user-defined memory leaks, null pointer
dereferences, unr
Hello Gustavo,
I have cc'ed the GCC Maintainership committee. They'll tell you what
steps you need to take for your patch.
Thanks for contributing.
All the best,
Jonas Jacobson
Copyright Administrator
Free Software Foundation
51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor
Boston, MA 02110
Phone +1-617-542-594
> It's turned out to be a somewhat staggered release...
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2006-03/msg00058.html
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2006-03/msg00169.html
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2006-03/msg00374.html
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2006-03/msg00376.html
>
> Circumstances beyond co
On Sat, 2006-03-25 at 10:35 -0500, Diego Novillo wrote:
> Start by looking at tree-vrp.c:infer_value_range.
I'm not so sure this is the best place to start.
It seems to me that the asserts could be registered at the
start of insert_range_assertions.
Just walk the parameter list and extract the d
Hi gang,
This ICE tends to crop up in the course of converting a port from assembly
to rtl pro/epilogue generation. In my case, I find it's happening because:
- the function I'm compiling has an attribute I've defined to mean 'isr
handler' applied to it, and
- as a result, in the prolog
On 25 Mar 2006 12:08:54 +, Gaius Mulley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Integrating the Modula-2 front-end?
>
> Hi,
>
> this would be an excellent thing to do.. What do you folks need me to
> do? Presumably bring gm2 up to the latest gcc cvs with its regression
> test suite working etc? Copyr
On 27 March 2006 15:06, Bernard Leak wrote:
> Dear List,
> the release announcements for the 3.4 series seem
> to be in trouble. Maybe I'm missing something subtle, but I
> think that the latest release is 3.4.6 (just out, the very latest
> GCC release as I write, on 2006/03/10)
Dear List,
the release announcements for the 3.4 series seem
to be in trouble. Maybe I'm missing something subtle, but I
think that the latest release is 3.4.6 (just out, the very latest
GCC release as I write, on 2006/03/10), and this should be
reflected in the release list at h
I just saw that I sent this email to the wrong mailing list. So I
reforward to gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Hi,
I am currently working on having GCC 4.1 working on mingw with ZCX
exceptions and I got the following issue with Ada and the constructors:
On windows a __main function in charge of calling the c
Sandro Tolaini writes:
> Finally, I managed to fix up libffi and run testing on libjava under
> Darwin/i386.
>
> The failures are due to the missing signal unwinding code (something
> that is out of my reach at the moment, so we must live with it at the
> moment unless someone is willi
Camm Maguire writes:
> Greetings! GCL is a lisp compiler system which outputs C code normally
> compiled by gcc into an object, which is then loaded and relocated
> into the running GCL image. In lisp, compiling is a very incremental
> process, with many, often thousands of small functions com
21 matches
Mail list logo
