GNU make 3.80 is a HUGE memory hog. It calls xstrdup to build
dependency list. gnu-src-gcc.deps in libjava has 3000+ targets depend
the same 3000+ files, whose filenames are more than 260K. For this
dependency alone, make takes 3000*260K == 761MB.
Then, you should make the 3000+ target depend
>It can be made to work by not packing Baz::m, and that is what g++ does
(with a
>warning%). Issuing an error in this case I don't think is acceptable
-- I know
>of users who would complain. If the user explicitly packed Baz::m
field, rather
>than the containing structure, I would be happy wit
The insn starts like this:
(insn 238 237 239 35 ../../../../../src/newlib/libc/stdio/vfprintf.c:604 (set
(reg/v:HI 175 [ ch ])
(sign_extend:HI (mem:QI (reg/v/f:HI 176 [ fmt ]) [0 S1 A8]))) 46
{extendqihi2} (nil)
(nil))
Reload 0: reload_in (HI) = (plus:HI (reg/f:HI 7 fb)
DJ Delorie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > It does seem like reload 0 should be RELOAD_FOR_ something _ADDR.
> > What set it to RELOAD_OTHER?
>
> Ok, we start with a RELOAD_OTHER for the zero_extendhisi.
I'm not clear on why that happens. Most reloads start out as
RELOAD_FOR_INPUT or RELOAD_FOR
I'm working on a project where I post-process AST (.tu) output from gcc
using the -fdump-translation-unit option.
Problem is the C compiler does not generate useful AST data. So I actually
run the preprocessed source again thru g++ to get AST data. This works fine
unless there are constructs n
> It does seem like reload 0 should be RELOAD_FOR_ something _ADDR.
> What set it to RELOAD_OTHER?
Ok, we start with a RELOAD_OTHER for the zero_extendhisi. The MEM's
address eventually gets RELOAD_FOR_OTHER_ADDRESS. Part of that
address is split out into another RELOAD_FOR_OTHER_ADDRESS.
Separ
> Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 08:35:41 +0100
> From: Hans-Peter Nilsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ... the JUMP_LABEL field in a JUMP_P ...
Almost-consistent typo: s/JUMP_LABEL/JUMP_TARGET/g to hopefully
make a little bit more sense of it all. (Attempting a
brain-dump before shuteyes always has some defe
I find the documentation on checking out branches, particularly
for branch releases, confusing. It doesn't say you need to use "tags"
instead of "branches" for releases.
Dave
--
J. David Anglin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
National Research Council of Canada (6
On Dec 12, 2005, at 7:33 PM, Mike Stump wrote:
On Dec 8, 2005, at 7:24 AM, Paul Martinolich wrote:
running 'make' yields the following error:
# /Users/martinol/auto_v4.0/third/gcc-4.1-20051202/configure
--disable-multilib
I suspect you'll want to file a bug for this so we don't loose trac
On Dec 8, 2005, at 7:24 AM, Paul Martinolich wrote:
running 'make' yields the following error:
# /Users/martinol/auto_v4.0/third/gcc-4.1-20051202/configure --
disable-multilib
I suspect you'll want to file a bug for this so we don't loose track
of it.
On Sun, 4 Dec 2005 20:07:33 -0500 (EST), Jack Howarth wrote:
>swigpy.cc: In function 'int SWIGPY_Python_ConvertPtr(PyObject*, void**,
>swig_typ
>e_info*, int)':
>swigpy.cc:620: warning: dereferencing type-punned pointer will break
>strict-alia
>sing rules
My recent encounters with python (in m
Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> Mark Mitchell wrote:
>
>> struct Foo { void operator=(Foo const &);};
>> struct Baz __attribute__((packed))
>> {
>>char c;
>>Foo m;
>> }
>>
>> void Bar (Baz *ptr)
>> {
>>ptr->m = something;
>> }
>>
>> I'm not sure it can be made to work, without making th
Peter Ward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On page: http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/
|
| The Following are corrupted:
| http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-3.4.5/gnat_ugn_unw.pdf
| http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-3.4.5/gnat_ugn_unw-html.tar.gz
|
| And the link
| (http://gcc
On page: http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/
The Following are corrupted:
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-3.4.5/gnat_ugn_unw.pdf
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-3.4.5/gnat_ugn_unw-html.tar.gz
And the link
(http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-3.4.5/docs-sources.tar.gz ) to t
Hi, I have updated the wiki with all current information:
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/CompileFarm
As indicated on the wiki:
If you are a GCC developper and want access to the compileFarm for GCC
development and testing, or if you are a free software developper
wishing to set up automated testing of
Hello,
I am experimenting with some different memory architectures and would like to isolate instruction and data accesses (Harvard architecture style). I am currently working with the PPC 405 processor and I am cross compiling applications using Crosstool (gcc-3.3.1 and glibc-2.3.2). The R_PPC_R
Mark Mitchell wrote:
struct Foo { void operator=(Foo const &);};
struct Baz __attribute__((packed))
{
char c;
Foo m;
}
void Bar (Baz *ptr)
{
ptr->m = something;
}
I'm not sure it can be made to work, without making the base class
version of Foo::operator= expect unaligned input
>
> --=-=-=
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
>
> : Floating point exception
> Please submit a full bug report,
> with preprocessed source if appropriate.
> See http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
>
> FAIL: objc.dg-struct-
On Linux/x86-64 I now get lots of new failures in the objc testsuite
like the following (gcc trunk):
Executing on host: /builds/gcc/misc/gcc/xgcc -B/builds/gcc/misc/gcc/
/builds/gcc/misc/gcc/testsuite/obj
c.dg-struct-layout-encoding-1/t001_main.m -w
-I/cvs/gcc-svn/trunk/gcc/testsuite/objc.dg/g
Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> Jan Beulich wrote:
>
>>
>> Why? It's broken. You just cannot embed something that requires
>> alignment into something that doesn't guarantee alignment, except that
>> for built-in types, the compiler can synthesize the necessary splitting,
>> but Foo's assignment operator,
Hi,
Bugzilla reports this morning that there are 113 open PRs with
gcc-3.4.6 target, out of which only two are considered
release-critical. There
middle-end/18956: [hppa] 'bus error' at runtime while passing a
special struct to a C++ member function
I need to generate a gcc binary that will always enable the
-fabi-version=1, because I have a library built with gcc 3.3 and I
need to link with it, but I would like to use gcc 4.
The libstdc++ ABI broke between these releases, so unless your library
doesn't use libstdc++ at all (somewhat unlike
Always interesting to compare seemingly duplicates. The variant
from fold-const.c seems to be more strict with types and sets
TREE_ADDRESSABLE on the base component, while the gfc variant
sets it on the passed tree itself. Other than that, the gfc variant
uses convert () to do typecasting. And
Mark Wielaard writes:
> Hi Gerald,
>
> On Mon, 2005-12-12 at 00:21 +0100, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> > On Sun, 4 Dec 2005, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > >> 2005-09-21 Mark Wielaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >>
> > >> * lib/split-for-gcj.sh: Cut list to 3 package levels deep.
> > > I rever
Hello Gabriel,
Monday, December 12, 2005, 12:47:17 PM, you wrote:
> Alexander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | I started exploring code base of cc1plus, and now I have little
> | question - how I can get access to tree representation of program (I
> | should do it after gcc/cp/parser.c:cp_parser_
Hi Gerald,
On Mon, 2005-12-12 at 00:21 +0100, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Dec 2005, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> >> 2005-09-21 Mark Wielaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>
> >> * lib/split-for-gcj.sh: Cut list to 3 package levels deep.
> > I reversed this (patch attached) and now my build wit
Alexander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I started exploring code base of cc1plus, and now I have little
| question - how I can get access to tree representation of program (I
| should do it after gcc/cp/parser.c:cp_parser_translation unit(...), isnt it?)
| If I wasnt mistaken, RTL began build only
27 matches
Mail list logo
