Re: Minimum/maximum operators are deprecated?

2005-09-10 Thread Peter Barada
>> It was an ill-defined and poorly maintained language extension that was >> broken in many cases. Proper replacements exist in standard C++: > >I am well aware of std::min/max. But they are not what I would call a 'proper >replacement', but that probably depends from the point of view. > >I ju

Re: Minimum/maximum operators are deprecated?

2005-09-10 Thread Gunther Piez
Am Samstag 10 September 2005 14:08 schrieben Sie: > > Is there a reason? > > It was an ill-defined and poorly maintained language extension that was > broken in many cases. Proper replacements exist in standard C++: I am well aware of std::min/max. But they are not what I would call a 'proper r

RE: gcc-4.0-20050908 is now available

2005-09-10 Thread Etienne Lorrain
The bug http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23631 was filled against 4.0.2-pre and is concerning C; the bug http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23477 is in C++ and filled against 4.1, it was marked duplicate, but it would be nice to have 4.0.2 fixed before release. Etienne.

Re: Minimum/maximum operators are deprecated?

2005-09-10 Thread Steven Bosscher
On Saturday 10 September 2005 13:48, Gunther Piez wrote: > Why? > > I just switched my project to gcc-4.0.1 and now i get tons of warnings :-( > I always found the min/max operators extremly useful, especially der > assignment variations ?= . There isn't even an replacemant for > them I am aware of

Minimum/maximum operators are deprecated?

2005-09-10 Thread Gunther Piez
Why? I just switched my project to gcc-4.0.1 and now i get tons of warnings :-( I always found the min/max operators extremly useful, especially der assignment variations ?= . There isn't even an replacemant for them I am aware of. Hell, I even overloaded them :-) Ok, this is possible with some

interprocedural CFG

2005-09-10 Thread sean yang
Can gcc provide an interprocedural CFG and dump it to a .vcg format file? I understand gcc provides intraprocedural CFG analysis, and wonder if interprocedural CFG is available. Thanks a lot. Sean for example, //file name: main.c extern void foo(); int main(){ int i=9; if (i>0) foo(); else

Re: sh64 support deteriorating

2005-09-10 Thread Kaz Kojima
Joern RENNECKE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I can't justify spending the amount time that it would take to make the > sh64 port regression free. > The lack of a debugger that works reliably with recent gcc versions has > led to an increasing > backlog of uninvestigated execution failures. Althou