[EMAIL PROTECTED] /local/tmp/gcc-3.4.4# ./config.guess
hppa1.1-hp-hpux10.20
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /local/tmp/gcc-3.4.4/objdir# gcc -v
Reading specs from
/local/opt/gcc-3.4.4/lib/gcc/hppa1.1-hp-hpux10.20/3.4.4/specs
Configured with: ../configure --disable-nls --prefix=/local/opt/gcc-3.4.4
--with-as=
Would that be useful, or is it overkill?
Very useful. Though if you can occasionally go back through them to
verify they're still bugs it'd be appreciated.
-eric
Geez, 'delta' from http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~dsw
really does seem to make it easy to track down
near-minimal testcases for ICEs.
It's tempting to continually beat the crap out of gcc-4.1 snapshots by
compiling all the sources I can find,
then for each ICE that occurs,
using delta to find a mini
Hello James,
Thanks for the information - I have now to report the problem to bugzilla (
redhat ),
because I used their build.
Just an additional question - those routines are missing in the online
documentation
( http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.0.1/gfortran/ )
In the previous manual ( htt
Richard,
Is there some sample code that one can use to test the
functionality of the code generated by -fstack-protector?
Also, if one has a buggy program that is corrupting the stack,
what is the expected behavior of this program when compiled
with the stack protection code? Should it always a
Richard Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 01:45:01PM -0700, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> > Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > > Yes, this is a compiler bug in the expansion of memcpy, please file a
> > > > bug report. The solution is for the compiler
Jack Howarth wrote:
In compiling xplor-nih under the gcc/g++ of 4.1 branch instead
of Apple's gcc/g++ 4.0 compilers from Xcode 2.1, I noticed that the
gnu gcc compiler doesn't gracefully handle the -bundle flag. On Apple's
compiler I can have a Makefile entry like...
This is PR 21366.
Yo
On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 09:39:13PM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote:
> Do you think I should be able to build gcc itself with the
> -fstack-protector flag and what is the most appropriate way to
> achieve that (ie brute force using a CFLAG or some configure
> flag)?
Considering that I don't think tha
Hi everyone,
I've filed #23224, which outlines some pretty substantial
problems with PIC on x86 targets (at least 2). This was
all tested on 3.4.4, but very similar, if not exact,
failures exist on the head of the 3_4-branch, and on
the 4_0-branch too. I havent tried top-of-tree. I doubt
this is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Recently I tried to install mpich-1.2.7 with gfortran (gcc-4.0.1) on a fedora
core 4 (x86_64) :
The configure for mpich fails for fortran, because getarg and iargc are missing.
Now my question, g77 supported a lot of commonly used service routines, which
are now missing
Richard,
Do you think I should be able to build gcc itself with the
-fstack-protector flag and what is the most appropriate way to
achieve that (ie brute force using a CFLAG or some configure
flag)? I am interested in doing this so that I can have a
libgfortran built with -fstack-protector to
Eric,
Well what I have is a gfortran 4.1 branch fink package built using
the 20050728 cvs with the new cray pointer patches donated by LANL.
What I am trying to do is the following. I have been trying to build
xplor-nih (which is a mix of c, c++ and fortran) with gfortran (it
works okay with g77
On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 08:48:46PM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote:
> Also, this is based on IBM's ProPolice code, right?
Logically. It's a complete rewrite.
r~
On Aug 3, 2005, at 5:48 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
Does anyone know if the -fstack-protector option in gcc 4.1 branch
works on Darwin 8 (Tiger)? I can compile binaries with it but I'm not
sure how to test its functionality. Also, this is based on IBM's
ProPolice
code, right?
I'm surprised
Does anyone know if the -fstack-protector option in gcc 4.1 branch
works on Darwin 8 (Tiger)? I can compile binaries with it but I'm not
sure how to test its functionality. Also, this is based on IBM's ProPolice
code, right?
Jack
Hi all,
A while ago I attempted to make a modification to gcc 4.0 before it
was released. I attempted to create a modification that would allow me
to document all exceptions that are eithre thrown directly by a
function/method or that could propagate through a function/method. I ran
into a
On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 12:15:05PM -0600, Shaun Jackman wrote:
> I'm not sure I understood the last line. s is a structure, and its
> address is aligned. How would you pass it to memcpy, and why would it
> generate an unaligned copy?
In the example I was replying to, S is a pointer to a structure,
On Mon, 1 Aug 2005, Roland McGrath wrote:
> initfini.c needs -fno-unit-at-a-time. It's not a normal compilation, but a
> special hack for generating assembly fragments. The development libc uses
> the flag for that file.
I see now that the powerpc32 and powerpc64 Makefiles are overriding the
d
Original Message
>From: Shaun Jackman
>Sent: 03 August 2005 19:15
> On 8/3/05, Richard Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> It is nevertheless correct. Examine all of the parts of the expression.
>>
>> In particular, "&s->b". What type does it have? In an ideal world, it
>> would be
On Aug 3, 2005, at 2:05 PM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
Andrew Pinski wrote:
The java front-end later on replaces prim_class with the correct
tree, witness how
the type of COMPONENT_REF is NULL.
where does this happen? do you happen to know?
Happens in java_complete_lhs in parse.y:
case CO
On 8/3/05, Richard Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It is nevertheless correct. Examine all of the parts of the expression.
>
> In particular, "&s->b". What type does it have? In an ideal world, it
> would be "pointer to unaligned integer". But we have no such type in
> our type system,
On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 05:28:43PM +0200, Gunther Nikl wrote:
> Thank you. With "emit_insn (gen_rtx_USE (VOIDmode, reg))" the abort
> disappears. The same approach seems to fix the loads in the prologue.
> I hope that this is the correct solution.
No, it isn't. Your problem is that you havn
Andrew Pinski wrote:
The java front-end later on replaces prim_class with the correct tree, witness
how
the type of COMPONENT_REF is NULL.
where does this happen? do you happen to know?
nathan
--
Nathan Sidwell:: http://www.codesourcery.com :: CodeSourcery LLC
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 01:45:01PM -0700, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > > Yes, this is a compiler bug in the expansion of memcpy, please file a
> > > bug report. The solution is for the compiler to notice the memory
> > > alignment of the destinatio
Giovanni Bajo wrote:
Mark,
- with your commit for PR 20142, you also committed a hunk to name-lookup.c
which is not described in the ChangeLog. It is also unclear whether it is
effectively need for that PR or not, but nonetheless it went in, so the entry
should probably be fixed
I wanted you t
>
> java is creating a COMPONENT_REF node where the first operand is a
> RECORD_TYPE,
> rather than an expresion or DECL node. This is created at java/class.c:1014
>
> prim_class = lookup_class (get_identifier (prim_class_name));
> return build3 (COMPONENT_REF, NULL_TRE
Gunther Nikl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am trying to add instructions into function prologue/epilogue. These
> instructions shall save and load "fixed" registers to avoid assembly.
>
> Register saving in the prologue appears to work. The restore code in the
> epilogue aborts in flow.c/propag
java is creating a COMPONENT_REF node where the first operand is a RECORD_TYPE,
rather than an expresion or DECL node. This is created at java/class.c:1014
prim_class = lookup_class (get_identifier (prim_class_name));
return build3 (COMPONENT_REF, NULL_TREE,
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I'm wondering if I can get information from here on how to use the
> > binfo macros.
> >
> What are the binfo access functions for gcc 3.4.1? I'm having trouble
> creating the html files for gcc and I've been told BINFO_BASE_BINFO and
> BINFO_BASE_ITERATE, which I
> "Shaun" == Shaun Jackman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Shaun> On 8/2/05, Paul Koning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> It sounds like the workaround is to avoid memcpy, and just use
>> variable assignment. Alternatively, cast the pointers to char*,
>> which should force memcpy to do the right
On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 02:56:08PM +1000, Greg Schafer wrote:
> Could somebody with appropriate privilege please do me a favor and reopen
> the following bugzilla PR?
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20003
Volker re-opened it.
Paul Leopardi wrote:
> I have now downloaded, bootstapped and installed gcc 4.0.1. The bug in g++
> optimization is still there. I've made an attempt to follow the instructions
> on minimizing test cases and have so far accomplished:
> wc of old preprocessed source:
> 99412 260586 2965538 peg
2nd implementation?:
http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~dsw/
This is what we all use, AFAIK :)
"Paul C. Leopardi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So I seem to be left with a large ( >2.5MB ) preprocessed source file. Should
> I try to report the bug using this large file as a test case?
Sure. But you might want to try using an automated tool
to reduce the test case first. There's one called
On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 03:50:09PM +0100, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> Gunther Nikl wrote:
> >I am trying to add instructions into function prologue/epilogue. These
> >instructions shall save and load "fixed" registers to avoid assembly.
> >
> >Register saving in the prologue appears to work. The restor
Hi Janis,
A belated reply to your message is below.
Best regards, Paul Leopardi
On Tue, 17 May 2005 03:23 am, Janis Johnson wrote:
> On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 12:16:54PM +1000, Paul C. Leopardi wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > I originally posted these messages to gcc-help, but had no reply, so I am
> > re-po
Nathan Sidwell wrote:
you can add a (USE reg) after the restore in the prologue. Then flow
in the EPILOGUE, of course
considers the register, and the preceding load, to be live at that point.
nathan
--
Nathan Sidwell:: http://www.codesourcery.com :: CodeSourcery LLC
[EMAIL PROT
Gunther Nikl wrote:
Hello!
I am trying to add instructions into function prologue/epilogue. These
instructions shall save and load "fixed" registers to avoid assembly.
Register saving in the prologue appears to work. The restore code in the
epilogue aborts in flow.c/propagate_one_insn with
"
Hello!
I am trying to add instructions into function prologue/epilogue. These
instructions shall save and load "fixed" registers to avoid assembly.
Register saving in the prologue appears to work. The restore code in the
epilogue aborts in flow.c/propagate_one_insn with
"Attempt to delete prol
> Hello,
>
> I'm wondering if I can get information from here on how to use the
> binfo macros.
>
What are the binfo access functions for gcc 3.4.1? I'm having trouble
creating the html files for gcc and I've been told BINFO_BASE_BINFO and
BINFO_BASE_ITERATE, which I found on the onlinedocs, are
Hello,
Recently I tried to install mpich-1.2.7 with gfortran (gcc-4.0.1) on a fedora
core 4 (x86_64) :
The configure for mpich fails for fortran, because getarg and iargc are missing.
Now my question, g77 supported a lot of commonly used service routines, which
are now missing or at least I
41 matches
Mail list logo
