I plan to create RC2 bits tomorrow.
The only PR which I currently think might merit holding up the final
release is:
20973 [4.0/4.1 Regression] kdelibs (khtml) miscompiled by reload
Michael Matz has attached a possible reload patch to the PR. Any comments?
I'm not going to wait very long even fo
On 4/17/05, Jack Howarth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Even if there were complete g77 compatibility in g95, folks may want
> to stick with the g77 version from gcc 3.4 for awhile purely for
> performance reasons. In doing some test runs of the APBS
> Adaptive Poisson-Boltzmann Solver program, I d
>> I've got a "Using and Porting GNU CC" manual for rev 2.95, and am
>> looking around for a newer one and can't find it anywhere. Does
>> anyone know if a newer printed manual is available(and if so, where I
>> can find it)?
>
>At the risk of stating the dreadfully obvious, the manual is online
Zack Weinberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ian Lance Taylor writes:
> > Peter Barada <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> I've got a "Using and Porting GNU CC" manual for rev 2.95, and am
> >> looking around for a newer one and can't find it anywhere. Does
> >> anyone know if a newer printed manua
Jack Howarth wrote:
>Even if there were complete g77 compatibility in g95, folks may want
> to stick with the g77 version from gcc 3.4 for awhile purely for
> performance reasons. In doing some test runs of the APBS
> Adaptive Poisson-Boltzmann Solver program, I discovered that the g95
> built
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jack Howarth) writes:
>Even if there were complete g77 compatibility in g95, folks may want
> to stick with the g77 version from gcc 3.4 for awhile purely for
> performance reasons. In doing some test runs of the APBS
> Adaptive Poisson-Boltzmann Solver program, I discover
Greetings.
I have a working MIPS cross toolchain with:
binutils-2.15
gcc-3.4.2
glibc-2.3.4
linux-2.6.12
and then decided to work with gcc-4.1.0 out of the cvs head. I am now
getting build problems with glibc-2.3.4 with the first major snafu
being:
../sysdeps/ieee754/dbl-64/s_isinf.c:
On Sat, Apr 16, 2005 at 11:47:05PM +0100, Mike Hearn wrote:
> I have a copy of Inkscape compiled with GCC 3.3, running on a GCC 3.4
> based system. All of the C++ libraries it links directly against, like
> GTKmm, are statically linked. In other words, it dynamically links
> against no C++ librarie
Even if there were complete g77 compatibility in g95, folks may want
to stick with the g77 version from gcc 3.4 for awhile purely for
performance reasons. In doing some test runs of the APBS
Adaptive Poisson-Boltzmann Solver program, I discovered that the g95
built binary runs 60% slower than t
Zack Weinberg wrote:
Branko Äibej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Zack Weinberg wrote:
"This compiler does not support all of Fortran 77 yet. We recommend
distributors continue to provide packages of g77 from GCC 3.4 for
the time being. When gfortran is considered a complete replacement
for g
Branko Äibej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Zack Weinberg wrote:
>
>> "This compiler does not support all of Fortran 77 yet. We recommend
>> distributors continue to provide packages of g77 from GCC 3.4 for
>> the time being. When gfortran is considered a complete replacement
>> for g77 we wi
Zack Weinberg wrote:
"This compiler does not support all of Fortran 77 yet. We recommend
distributors continue to provide packages of g77 from GCC 3.4 for
the time being. When gfortran is considered a complete replacement
for g77 we will announce it."
"We recommend distributors continue...
Although, RTL expansion may introduce new loops, these tend to be
rare, and the expanders have all the information they need to
hoist/sink invariant expressions and unroll/peel themselves.
I disagree. In order to make the proper decisions about merging givs
and chosing which giv shoul
Ian Lance Taylor writes:
> Peter Barada <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I've got a "Using and Porting GNU CC" manual for rev 2.95, and am
>> looking around for a newer one and can't find it anywhere. Does
>> anyone know if a newer printed manual is available(and if so, where I
>> can find it)?
>
>
Peter Barada <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've got a "Using and Porting GNU CC" manual for rev 2.95, and am
> looking around for a newer one and can't find it anywhere. Does
> anyone know if a newer printed manual is available(and if so, where I
> can find it)?
At the risk of stating the dreadf
Snapshot gcc-4.0-20050416 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.0-20050416/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.0 CVS branch
with the following options: -rgcc-ss-4_0-20050416
You'll
>> pp_pack.c:2220: error: unable to find a register to spill in class
>> `ADDR_REGS'
>> pp_pack.c:2220: error: this is the insn:
>> (insn 5559 5558 5560 694 pp_pack.c:2144 (set (reg:SI 8 %a0 [1421])
>> (plus:SI (subreg:SI (reg:QI 1420) 0)
>> (const_int -32 [0xffe0]))) 121
Hi,
I have a copy of Inkscape compiled with GCC 3.3, running on a GCC 3.4
based system. All of the C++ libraries it links directly against, like
GTKmm, are statically linked. In other words, it dynamically links
against no C++ libraries.
Inkscape dlopens libgtkspell, which in turn dlopens libaspe
hello, list
I am not sure if someone has reported this before,
make[1]: Entering directory
`/home/gshi/gcc/gcc-4.0.0-20050410/build-i686-pc-linux-gnu/libiberty'
make[1]: *** No rule to make target `../include/ansidecl.h', needed by
`regex.o'. Stop.
make[1]: Leaving directory
`/home/gshi/gcc/g
Jason Merrill wrote:
On Thu, 14 Apr 2005 17:11:58 +0100, Nathan Sidwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Could you clarify whether 'other writes' means 'other _volatile_ writes',
or '_any_ other writes'? Since non-volatile writes are not visible
outside of the abstract machine, how can they be ordered
Hi!
gfortran does not support -Werror it seems. What do I need to put in
dg-options to make a testcase fail, if there is any warning?
Thanks,
Richard.
I seem to have inadvertantly annoyed Steven Bosscher on IRC,
so by way of an apology and explanation I thought I'd post my current
opinion and thinking on the optimizations performed by GCC's middle-end
both at the tree-level in the tree-ssa optimizers and at the
RTL-level in the exisiting RTL-opt
On 04/16/2005 10:19 AM, Larry Evans wrote:
[snip]
I briefly looked at several papers from:
http://www.praxis-his.com/publications/
[snip]
principled_design_oo.pdf
[snip]
I should mention that this paper does mention dynamic dispatching
but nothing about templates or generic types.
Sachin Vijay Sonawane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In .md file, while writing Function-unit specifications, we have to
> define an attribute called "simultaneity". I am still confused to get
> the correct meaning it. Can anyone plz elaborate on it? I have found
> the following definition from G
On 04/15/2005 08:36 PM, Robert Dewar wrote:
[snip]
As I said, templates and Ada generics cause trouble with certification
requirements in two respects. First, they have the potential to intefere
with required traceability from source to object. Second, there are a
number of formal techniques that a
On Sat, Apr 16, 2005 at 01:13:46PM +0800, Steve Yee wrote:
> the following code can not compile. is it due to the standard?
Yes, this is not valid C++. int* -> const int* creates a temporary and
you can't bind a non-const reference to a temporary.
You might mean
void testfun(int * const & pr)
o
2):
$cat x.c
typedef unsigned char GROUP9_T[3];
typedef GROUP9_T EGROUP9_T __attribute ((eeprom));
$./cc1 --version
GNU C version 4.1.0 20050416 (experimental) (i686-pc-linux-gnu)
compiled by GNU C version 4.1.0 20050302 (experimental).
GGC heuristics: --param ggc-min-expand=30 --param ggc-min
On Thu, 14 Apr 2005, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> This patch accomplishes the goal to get rid of asterisks in @anchor
> names by
>
> - replacing components of a target triplet which read "*" by "x",
> - and omiting trailing asterisks from all other components.
>
> Tested by running doc/install.texi2
Praxis is certainly of the opinion that a limited form of generics
can be accomodated, but I do not think that anyone would suggest
that unlimited use of C++ templates could be easily accomodated
by some of these tools.
I think that is beside the point of what I was trying to get from
your previo
Hi!
In .md file, while writing Function-unit specifications, we have to
define an attribute called "simultaneity". I am still confused to get the
correct meaning it. Can anyone plz elaborate on it? I have found the
following definition from GCC manual.
"simultaneity specifies the maximum numb
30 matches
Mail list logo
