Nathan Sidwell wrote:
Bug 20505 is an ICE with -ggdb2. We have the following member
definition,
const int b::d = ((int)(&((b*)1)->c) - 1);
whose initializer used to be folded during construction to an INT_CST, but
now it doesn't -- fold cannot fold the complete expression. As
the PR says, this
On Sun, 13 Mar 2005, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
> Trampolines are strange things... :-)
> - AFAICT, the cris target is saving the value of the
> static chain register in the trampoline. How can that work
> with recursive functions?
What's wrong with that?
Do I miss something fundamental?
> Does t
I'm in the midst of fixing the m68k prologue/epilogue code for
ColdFire and its FPU, and stumbled across a problem. The following
code when compiled with -O2 -mcfv4e -fomit-frame-pointer (with the v4e cod in):
double func(int i1, int i2, int i3, int i4, double a, double b)
{
int stuff[8192];
Paul Schlie wrote:
Steven Bosscher wrote:
IIRC these notes are for CCO, and you have to move the CC setter
and user together.
- unless it can be guaranteed that the particular setter's cc, will be
preserved (i.e. not corrupted by successive operations) prior to it's
ultimate use; ...
Steven was
Mostafa Hagog wrote:
Thanks for the information, what we were doing was to call
update_life_info_in_dirty_blocks, but for some reason this wasn't
sufficient to
mark a register dead (REG_DEAD note) when the register was defined in a
predecessor block and dies in the dirty block; we had to call
updat
Rene Rebe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm just doing the first benchmarking with the 4.0.0 pre release
> (20050319) and just noticed that -O0 build time is not always the
> fastest. (In contrast to what the changes suggest: "When compiling
> without optimizations (-O0), the C++ fro
The test case is the following Ada files:
with Pkg1;
procedure Main is
C : Pkg1.Instance := ((Time => (2.345, 4)), 126);
begin
null;
end Main;
package Msg is
type Float_64 is digits 15;
type Uint_16 is mod 65_536;
type Time_Stamp is
record
Sec : Float_64 :
On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 09:37:46AM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi, GNU,
>
> In ./gcc-3.4.3/INSTALL/test.html , in section:
> "0.5 Submitting test results
> .
> This script uses the >>>Mail<<< program to send the results, so make sure it
> is in your PATH.."
>
> Not having "Mail
Hi all,
I'm just doing the first benchmarking with the 4.0.0 pre release
(20050319) and just noticed that -O0 build time is not always the
fastest. (In contrast to what the changes suggest: "When compiling
without optimizations (-O0), the C++ frontend is much faster than in any
previous version
Snapshot gcc-3.3-20050323 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/3.3-20050323/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 3.3 CVS branch
with the following options: -rgcc-ss-3_3-20050323
You'll
Hi, GNU,
In ./gcc-3.4.3/INSTALL/test.html , in section:
"0.5 Submitting test results
.
This script uses the >>>Mail<<< program to send the results, so make sure it is
in your PATH.."
Not having "Mail", I went to Cygwin's setup & looked for "Mail", but there was
no such program liste
On Wed, 2005-03-23 at 18:17 +0100, Mile Davidovic wrote:
> Hello
>
> I will try to modify multilib options.
> I have question regarding how to add my changes in gcc (see thread Mips
> question)
> I already sent FSF copyright agreement and I receive confirmation. So I
> would like
> to introduc
Alexandre Oliva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >2a) Define the clobbercc attribute to be "yes" for each insn which
> >changes the condition codes unpredictably. Typically the
> >default would be "yes", and then either clobbercc would be
> >written to use cond to select
Hi,
Bootstrap with the reload-branch dies on ia64 in stage0 while
building unwind-ia64.c:
./xgcc -B./ -B/usr/local/ia64-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/ -isystem
/usr/local/ia64-unknown-linux-gnu/include -isystem
/usr/local/ia64-unknown-linux-gnu/sys-include -L/abuild/stevenb/build/gcc/../ld
-O2 -DIN_G
> The best option is a clean and maintainable parser. Whether it uses a
> parser generator or not is comparatively academic...
Many years later ...
Clean is good for our health, dirty is bad for our health.
> --
> This is like system("/usr/funky/bin/perl -e 'exec sleep 1'");
>--- Peter da S
On Mar 23, 2005, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>2a) Define the clobbercc attribute to be "yes" for each insn which
>changes the condition codes unpredictably. Typically the
>default would be "yes", and then either clobbercc would be
>written to use cond to select instructio
Hello
I will try to modify multilib options.
I have question regarding how to add my changes in gcc (see thread Mips
question)
I already sent FSF copyright agreement and I receive confirmation. So I
would like
to introduce switch for forbidding generating unaligned load and store
instruction.
> If my conclusion is correct, is it possible to rebuild this libraries with
> -mlong-calls and -G0 option?
Yes. You'll need to modify the multilib options.
-eric
The gomp branch fails to bootstrap for libtool problems in libgomp.
Verified on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu and on i686-unknown-linux-gnu.
It appears that the fix is pretty easy: libgomp/configure (and related files)
need to be regenerated. This fix the problem on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
Can I as
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Richard Kenner) writes:
> 3) Write a new optimization pass enabled on targets which define
>NOTICE_UPDATE_CC. I think this pass would be run just before
>machine dependent reorg, although perhaps there is a better place
>for it. Walk through the ins
3) Write a new optimization pass enabled on targets which define
NOTICE_UPDATE_CC. I think this pass would be run just before
machine dependent reorg, although perhaps there is a better place
for it. Walk through the instructions, calling NOTICE_UPDATE_CC on
each o
We would like to eliminate cc0 and the associated machinery from the
compiler, because it is complicated and not supported on popular or
modern processors. Here is a plan which I think could accomplish that
without unreasonable effort.
1) Modify the programs which read the .md file to look for an
Does that option do anything except supply -maltivec implicitly?
Hello Webmaster,
We have been looking for partners to exchange links with our site -
http://www.phentermine-information.us
from my side, I put your link on -
http://www.2-buy-cheap-phentermine.com (PR=4 site)
If you accept my offer, please use the following linking details:
URL: http://www.p
On Mar 22, 2005, at 22:09, Per Bothner wrote:
Of course that's in the eye of the beholder. I think a local
translation
is cleaner and more robust/safer than a global opaque type/call-back.
OK, let's go with that approach then.
-Geert
Ok it could be problem with binutils/gcc.
But in general this problem will occurs if size of data and bss section is
big enough, so gp can not be
set on proper place. If we have large project (mixed c and c++, linked with
libstdc++, libsupc++) and if we compiled
project source with -mlong-calls
Bug 20505 is an ICE with -ggdb2. We have the following member
definition,
const int b::d = ((int)(&((b*)1)->c) - 1);
whose initializer used to be folded during construction to an INT_CST, but
now it doesn't -- fold cannot fold the complete expression. As
the PR says, this was changed by,
2004-0
Hi Kazu,
> fr30
>
>
> The same justification as
>
>http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2004-06/msg01113.html
>
> Nobody showed an interest in keeping this port.
I would like to keep this port alive. I happen to know that Fujitsu
are still involved with developing and marketing it and that the
28 matches
Mail list logo
