Will people install gfortran in 4.0? [was Re: Shipping gmp and mpfr with gcc-4.0?]

2005-02-19 Thread Bradley Lucier
On Feb 19, 2005, at 11:18 AM, Eric Botcazou wrote: So now what? Not build shared libraries for gmp? Add /pkgs/gmp-4.1.4 to my LD_LIBRARY_PATH? The latter. Well, I can't really require people using the compiler to have /pkgs/gcc-4.0/lib, /pkgs/gcc-4.0/lib/sparcv9, *and* /pkgs/gmp-4.1.4 in their

Re: Shipping gmp and mpfr with gcc-4.0?

2005-02-19 Thread Eric Botcazou
> So now what? Not build shared libraries for gmp? Add /pkgs/gmp-4.1.4 > to my LD_LIBRARY_PATH? The latter. > This is supposed to be straightforward? I guess so. :-) -- Eric Botcazou

Re: Shipping gmp and mpfr with gcc-4.0?

2005-02-19 Thread Bradley Lucier
On Feb 16, 2005, at 2:13 AM, Eric Botcazou wrote: I tried this evening to install gmp-4.1.4 and mpfr-2.1.0 on my Solaris machines and I failed on the first try. (I think the default install for gmp on my machines is a 64-bit version, but the default for mpfr and gcc is 32-bit, so I'm going to have

moving v16sf reg with multiple sub-regs

2005-02-19 Thread Dylan Cuthbert
Hi there, I have implemented a move of a v16sf type like this because it is held by 4 v4sf registers: --- snip --- (define_expand "movv16sf" [(set (match_operand:V16SF 0 "nonimmediate_operand" "") (match_operand:V16SF 1 "general_operand" ""))] "" " if ((

Re: MMX built-ins performance oddities

2005-02-19 Thread Prakash Punnoor
Andrew Pinski schrieb: On Feb 19, 2005, at 8:21 AM, Prakash Punnoor wrote: Is this a known issue with gcc-3.4.3? I compiled the code using -O2 -march=athlon-xp -g3. If you want a smaller test case, I could try to do so. Right now I just didn't want to waste my time in case this is a know issue or I

Re: MMX built-ins performance oddities

2005-02-19 Thread Andrew Pinski
On Feb 19, 2005, at 8:21 AM, Prakash Punnoor wrote: Is this a known issue with gcc-3.4.3? I compiled the code using -O2 -march=athlon-xp -g3. If you want a smaller test case, I could try to do so. Right now I just didn't want to waste my time in case this is a know issue or I did something stupid

MMX built-ins performance oddities

2005-02-19 Thread Prakash Punnoor
Hi, I noticed something strange when I use GCC's builtins for MMX: I defined some unions: typedef int v4hi __attribute__ ((__mode__(__V4HI__))); typedef int v2si __attribute__ ((__mode__(__V2SI__))); typedef int di __attribute__ ((__mode__(__DI__))); typedef union { v4hi v; short s[4]; int i[

Project submission for GCC 4.1 - AltiVec rewrite

2005-02-19 Thread Paolo Bonzini
I had already submitted this to Mark, but since I have improved a few rough spots in the code I think it's better to make it public. * Project Title AltiVec rewrite. * Project Contributors Paolo Bonzini * Dependencies none > * Delivery Date March 15th or earlier (the implementation is complete an

Re: [PATCH] Don't assume const/pure calls are total (fix PR tree-optimization/19828)

2005-02-19 Thread Zdenek Dvorak