I don't think I understood your reply or maybe there was no reply. If there was
a reply then I'd love to hear your ideas on how to take care of this issue.
Without threading.
Sent from TypeApp
On May 31, 2018, 13:37, at 13:37, "Benoît Minisini" wrote:
>Le 31/05/2018 à 23:27, MacGyver via Ga
It is amazing how programmers are so petty. I went through and reread that
thread and I don't see any answers in there to what I'm trying to do. By the
way your insult was really not much of an insult. However I will give you a
good one. You are a complete moron and socially inept. Instead of na
You actually put an answer in earlier that makes sense something I will look
into. However your initial reply included name calling why don't you take a
look back at something called "necromancer". As you put it in your reply it was
very condescending and clearly meant to insult that is why you
Or you could use terms that all peopleof all cultures understand and stop
beating the dead horse. You used some kind of terminology specific to one
culture that was your mistake I took it as an insult my mistake. Now the
question is does this keep going or do we realize that we both spoke poorly
you for your
information I have a lot of stuff to look up to try to get that together.
Sent from TypeApp
On May 31, 2018, 15:52, at 15:52, Tobias Boege wrote:
>On Thu, 31 May 2018, Steve G via Gambas-user wrote:
>> If you really are so good, then prove me wrong and actually show
Most people don't ask for clarification when they believe there's an insult in
there. Next time somebody calls you and ass I'd like to see if you clarify it
with them but yes we should kill this dead horse again. You're welcome to put
the last word if you'd like
Sent from TypeApp
On May 31,
