Hi,
I have added support for vendor prefix in revision #7256.
Moreover, I rewrote the package naming algorithm, so that it can be
build differently for each distribution.
At the moment, the routine is the same for all: everything is converted
to lower case, every diacritic is removed, and all
Le 29/08/2015 14:08, adamn...@gmail.com a écrit :
> On Sat, 29 Aug 2015 01:05:12 +0200 Benoît Minisini
> wrote:
>
>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Can you try revision #7245 and tell me if it is fine for you?
>>>
>>> Now a component project can have any name you want.
>>>
>>> Then the packager will internally pr
On Sat, 29 Aug 2015 01:05:12 +0200
Benoît Minisini wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Can you try revision #7245 and tell me if it is fine for you?
> >
> > Now a component project can have any name you want.
> >
> > Then the packager will internally prefix the project name with the
> > vendor name if not pr
Le 29/08/2015 01:04, Benoît Minisini a écrit :
> Le 18/08/2015 23:41, adamn...@gmail.com a écrit :
>> On Tue, 18 Aug 2015 16:56:48 +0300
>> Jussi Lahtinen wrote:
>>
>>> I tested packaging with revision 7222. In vendor name "-" is
>>> translated as
>>> "_". I have some vague image in my head that t
Le 18/08/2015 23:41, adamn...@gmail.com a écrit :
> On Tue, 18 Aug 2015 16:56:48 +0300
> Jussi Lahtinen wrote:
>
>> I tested packaging with revision 7222. In vendor name "-" is translated as
>> "_". I have some vague image in my head that this was done to comply with
>> some linux standard.
>> But
Le 18/08/2015 23:41, adamn...@gmail.com a écrit :
> On Tue, 18 Aug 2015 16:56:48 +0300
> Jussi Lahtinen wrote:
>
>> I tested packaging with revision 7222. In vendor name "-" is translated as
>> "_". I have some vague image in my head that this was done to comply with
>> some linux standard.
>> But
> a) there is no such standard.
>
In Debian naming convention "-" seems to be reserved to mark for following
version number, but you are right, this is not it.
> b) it only happens with component projects - see attached pic
>
OK, but that makes sense, since it's gambas component.
> I don't u
On Tue, 18 Aug 2015 16:56:48 +0300
Jussi Lahtinen wrote:
> I tested packaging with revision 7222. In vendor name "-" is translated as
> "_". I have some vague image in my head that this was done to comply with
> some linux standard.
> But I don't see *anything *get prefixed with "gambas"??
>
a)
I tested packaging with revision 7222. In vendor name "-" is translated as
"_". I have some vague image in my head that this was done to comply with
some linux standard.
But I don't see *anything *get prefixed with "gambas"??
I dont need all my project directories named "paddys-hill.something" I
