Le 16/10/2013 23:38, Charlie Reinl a écrit :
> Am Samstag, den 12.10.2013, 12:02 +0200 schrieb Charlie Reinl:
>> Am Samstag, den 12.10.2013, 09:29 +0200 schrieb Benoît Minisini:
>>> Le 11/10/2013 14:17, Karl Reinl a écrit :
Salut Benoît,
in the attached example there is good and a ba
Am Samstag, den 12.10.2013, 12:02 +0200 schrieb Charlie Reinl:
> Am Samstag, den 12.10.2013, 09:29 +0200 schrieb Benoît Minisini:
> > Le 11/10/2013 14:17, Karl Reinl a écrit :
> > > Salut Benoît,
> > >
> > > in the attached example there is good and a bad way to set printer
> > > properties.
> > >
Am Samstag, den 12.10.2013, 09:29 +0200 schrieb Benoît Minisini:
> Le 11/10/2013 14:17, Karl Reinl a écrit :
> > Salut Benoît,
> >
> > in the attached example there is good and a bad way to set printer
> > properties.
> > I ignore why that happens, but with the 'bad way', paper is reset to 0,
> > a
Le 11/10/2013 14:17, Karl Reinl a écrit :
> Salut Benoît,
>
> in the attached example there is good and a bad way to set printer
> properties.
> I ignore why that happens, but with the 'bad way', paper is reset to 0,
> after .Configure().
> Juist run the example, after Configure() call, just close
Salut Benoît,
in the attached example there is good and a bad way to set printer
properties.
I ignore why that happens, but with the 'bad way', paper is reset to 0,
after .Configure().
Juist run the example, after Configure() call, just close with 'print'.
--
Amicalement
Charlie
PrintingTest