On 29.12.2011 22:51, Benoît Minisini wrote:
>> o.k., thanks.
>> well, but there it continues confusing: ls -l shows that gbr2 is a link
>> to gbx2 and has different functionality?
>>
> Yes, this is a common trick on Unix. Search for 'busybox' if you don't
> trust me. :-)
>
i thought, it was a feat
>
> o.k., thanks.
> well, but there it continues confusing: ls -l shows that gbr2 is a link
> to gbx2 and has different functionality?
>
Yes, this is a common trick on Unix. Search for 'busybox' if you don't
trust me. :-)
--
Benoît Minisini
-
It is the same file. When gbx2 starts up, it checks whether the provided
executable name (argv[0]) is "gbr2" or "gbx2", and choose what to do
depending on that.
2011/12/29 tobias
> On 29.12.2011 22:43, Benoît Minisini wrote:
> > Le 29/12/2011 22:31, tobias a écrit :
> >> hi,
> >>
> >> we recentl
On 29.12.2011 22:43, Benoît Minisini wrote:
> Le 29/12/2011 22:31, tobias a écrit :
>> hi,
>>
>> we recently got confused about the gbx executable. i forward a specific
>> question about gbx2:
>> ---
>> $ gbx2 /path/to/project/directory
>> runs the program (using the compiled stuff in .gambas subdi
Le 29/12/2011 22:31, tobias a écrit :
> hi,
>
> we recently got confused about the gbx executable. i forward a specific
> question about gbx2:
> ---
> $ gbx2 /path/to/project/directory
> runs the program (using the compiled stuff in .gambas subdirectory?)
> $ /path/to/archive
> runs the compiled ar
hi,
we recently got confused about the gbx executable. i forward a specific
question about gbx2:
---
$ gbx2 /path/to/project/directory
runs the program (using the compiled stuff in .gambas subdirectory?)
$ /path/to/archive
runs the compiled archive
but is there a way to run a compiled archive wit
