> Maybe there are different versions, maybe it was my fault.
> I had a package 'libiodbc-devel' installed and replaced it by
> 'unixODBC-devel'. Now, 'make' doesn't complain about ODBC anymore.
>
How could two different libraries have the two same non-compatible include
files? Pfff...
> Instead
Maybe there are different versions, maybe it was my fault.
I had a package 'libiodbc-devel' installed and replaced it by 'unixODBC-devel'.
Now, 'make' doesn't complain about ODBC anymore.
Instead, I have an error about CDial_moc.cpp now.
Will see what I can do...
Am 29.07.2011 23:31, schrieb Be
> Here it is.
>
> Am 29.07.2011 01:30, schrieb Benoît Minisini:
> > Can you send me the contents of /usr/include/sqlext.h ?
Mmm. Your sqlext.h is completely different from mine. Are there different ODBC
libraries on Linux?
--
Benoît Minisini
---
> I updated from SUSE 11.2 to 11.4, and had to start from zero again
> (Gambas3, svn, qt4).
>
> 'configure' ends with the message:
> || THESE COMPONENTS ARE DISABLED:
> || - gb.db.postgresql
> || - gb.gtk
>
> which is ok for me.
>
> 'make' terminates with the following errors in gb.db.odbc:
> Ma
I updated from SUSE 11.2 to 11.4, and had to start from zero again (Gambas3,
svn, qt4).
'configure' ends with the message:
||
|| THESE COMPONENTS ARE DISABLED:
|| - gb.db.postgresql
|| - gb.gtk
||
which is ok for me.
'make' terminates with the following errors in gb.db.odbc:
Making all in gb.db.
