On Mon, 07 Jan 2013, Beno?t Minisini wrote:
> Le 07/01/2013 12:27, Beno?t Minisini a ?crit :
> > Le 06/01/2013 11:32, Tobias Boege a ?crit :
> that the File_Read() event is called without end
> >>>
> >>> Logical, as a normal file is always ready to be read.
> >>>
> >>
> >> The doc says: "If at
Le 07/01/2013 12:27, Benoît Minisini a écrit :
> Le 06/01/2013 11:32, Tobias Boege a écrit :
that the File_Read() event is called without end
>>>
>>> Logical, as a normal file is always ready to be read.
>>>
>>
>> The doc says: "If at least one byte can be read". This statement is IMHO
>> ambi
Le 06/01/2013 11:32, Tobias Boege a écrit :
>>> that the File_Read() event is called without end
>>
>> Logical, as a normal file is always ready to be read.
>>
>
> The doc says: "If at least one byte can be read". This statement is IMHO
> ambiguous. I expected the Read() event to be raised when Lof
On Sun, 06 Jan 2013, Beno?t Minisini wrote:
> Le 06/01/2013 02:20, Tobias Boege a ?crit :
> > Hi Benoit,
> >
> > here's the story: I originally wanted to redirect the Error
> > instruction's default stream to a pipe which I could then read from
> > in the same application. For some reason I got a "
Le 06/01/2013 02:20, Tobias Boege a écrit :
> Hi Benoit,
>
> here's the story: I originally wanted to redirect the Error
> instruction's default stream to a pipe which I could then read from
> in the same application. For some reason I got a "Bad file
> descriptor" (must be EBADF?) error when using
Hi Benoit,
here's the story: I originally wanted to redirect the Error instruction's
default stream to a pipe which I could then read from in the same
application. For some reason I got a "Bad file descriptor" (must be EBADF?)
error when using
Error "test"
after having redirected
Error To #File
