urday, October 20, 2012 12:16 AM
> To: mailing list for gambas users
> Subject: Re: [Gambas-user] Suggestion for gb.settings component
>
> Just a thought, Christer, but have you tried using "comment" entries
> in your settings? What I mean is have, for example, a setting
e-
> From: Benoît Minisini [mailto:gam...@users.sourceforge.net]
> Sent: Friday, October 19, 2012 2:19 PM
> To: mailing list for gambas users
> Subject: Re: [Gambas-user] Suggestion for gb.settings component
>
> I'm afraid not: the order of how things are written to t
On 19/10/2012, Christer Johansson wrote:
>
> It would be great if it leaved the exisiting comments intact since
> when dealing with large .conf files comments are IMHO invaluable to
> have in there.
>
Just a thought, Christer, but have you tried using "comment" entries
in your settings? What I me
Le 19/10/2012 14:14, Christer Johansson a écrit :
>
> When using gb.settings to write to existing .conf files I noticed
> it automaticly removed all comments lines.
>
> It would be great if it leaved the exisiting comments intact since
> when dealing with large .conf files comments are IMHO invalua
When using gb.settings to write to existing .conf files I noticed
it automaticly removed all comments lines.
It would be great if it leaved the exisiting comments intact since
when dealing with large .conf files comments are IMHO invaluable to
have in there.
Just an idea and hope it makes sense.
