On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 2:44 PM, RICHARD WALKER
wrote:
> On 23/09/2012, Sebastian Kulesz wrote:
>> On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 1:08 PM, RICHARD WALKER
>> wrote:
>>> So I was wondering, does it make sense to re-code a project so that
>>> strings, or string constants are used for repeated fragments of
OK Sebastian,
I have done a bit of research (spelt g-o-o-g-l-e) and I have decided
to set a constant string as "LANG=C" and add it to the front of those
shell commands my program issues where the text of the sub-processes'
output is important.
My reasoning is that if that changes the text I am che
On 23/09/2012, Sebastian Kulesz wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 1:08 PM, RICHARD WALKER
> wrote:
>> So I was wondering, does it make sense to re-code a project so that
>> strings, or string constants are used for repeated fragments of text?
>> Might such an approach actually make it harder to tr
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 1:08 PM, RICHARD WALKER
wrote:
> Greetings to all,
>
> I have been experimenting with the Translate option in the IDE. Just
> for fun, I took a current mini-project which is nearing completion and
> marked it up for translation. At only 116 strings it is not too
> daunting
Greetings to all,
I have been experimenting with the Translate option in the IDE. Just
for fun, I took a current mini-project which is nearing completion and
marked it up for translation. At only 116 strings it is not too
daunting a task. To make it even easier I elected to start with a
translatio
