> On Thu, 2010-11-25 at 20:06 +0100, tobias wrote:
> > > A result object stores the entire query of the result in memory,
> >
> > because of
> >
> > > the stupidity of most SQL backends.
>
> Hmmm, I'd take that statement with a grain of salt. When working on
> databases at work, I think we'd ha
On Thu, 2010-11-25 at 20:06 +0100, tobias wrote:
> > A result object stores the entire query of the result in memory,
> because of
> > the stupidity of most SQL backends.
Hmmm, I'd take that statement with a grain of salt. When working on
databases at work, I think we'd have soon run into majo
Benoît Minisini schrieb:
>> good evening all,
>> i have another question about my eternal punishment: the result object :-)
>>
>> caveat answered to a former question about results in general:
>> >If you got into the habit of reading all the
>> >records you've selected into memory (or even if the
> 2010/11/25 Benoît Minisini :
> >> good evening all,
> >> i have another question about my eternal punishment: the result object
> >> :-)
> >>
> >> caveat answered to a former question about results in general:
> >> >If you got into the habit of reading all the
> >> >records you've selected int
2010/11/25 Benoît Minisini :
>> good evening all,
>> i have another question about my eternal punishment: the result object :-)
>>
>> caveat answered to a former question about results in general:
>> >If you got into the habit of reading all the
>> >records you've selected into memory (or even if
> good evening all,
> i have another question about my eternal punishment: the result object :-)
>
> caveat answered to a former question about results in general:
> >If you got into the habit of reading all the
> >records you've selected into memory (or even if the Result object
> >worked
> >
good evening all,
i have another question about my eternal punishment: the result object :-)
caveat answered to a former question about results in general:
>If you got into the habit of reading all the
>records you've selected into memory (or even if the Result object
>worked
>that way behind
