Le 19/10/2012 14:53, Fabien Bodard a écrit :
>
> is there a way to deal with application.args to manage special args
> when gb.args is used ?
>
Args.End() will return all arguments that were not interpreted - it
assumes that they are file names.
But if you don't want to deal with the syntax imp
2012/10/19 Benoît Minisini :
> Le 19/10/2012 14:19, Bruce a écrit :
>> On Fri, 2012-10-19 at 12:57 +0200, Benoît Minisini wrote:
>>> Le 19/10/2012 12:55, Bruce a écrit :
One other!
For the future. Could you consider the use of -/+ options (and --/++).
The only example I can thi
Le 19/10/2012 14:19, Bruce a écrit :
> On Fri, 2012-10-19 at 12:57 +0200, Benoît Minisini wrote:
>> Le 19/10/2012 12:55, Bruce a écrit :
>>> One other!
>>>
>>> For the future. Could you consider the use of -/+ options (and --/++).
>>> The only example I can think of at the moment is vi, as in
>>>
On Fri, 2012-10-19 at 12:57 +0200, Benoît Minisini wrote:
> Le 19/10/2012 12:55, Bruce a écrit :
> > One other!
> >
> > For the future. Could you consider the use of -/+ options (and --/++).
> > The only example I can think of at the moment is vi, as in
> > vi +3 .project
> > which starts
Le 19/10/2012 12:55, Bruce a écrit :
> One other!
>
> For the future. Could you consider the use of -/+ options (and --/++).
> The only example I can think of at the moment is vi, as in
> vi +3 .project
> which starts vi and positions the cursor at line 3.
>
> regards
> Bruce
>
This is n
One other!
For the future. Could you consider the use of -/+ options (and --/++).
The only example I can think of at the moment is vi, as in
vi +3 .project
which starts vi and positions the cursor at line 3.
regards
Bruce
--
Le 19/10/2012 12:19, Bruce a écrit :
> On Tue, 2012-10-16 at 02:06 +0200, Benoît Minisini wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> In the last revision, I added a new component 'gb.args', which replaces
>> the unmaintained 'gb.option'. By the way, does anyone use 'gb.option'?
>>
>> The goal of this component made in Ga
On Tue, 2012-10-16 at 02:06 +0200, Benoît Minisini wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In the last revision, I added a new component 'gb.args', which replaces
> the unmaintained 'gb.option'. By the way, does anyone use 'gb.option'?
>
> The goal of this component made in Gambas is analyzing the command-line
> argu
Le 16/10/2012 18:21, Olivier Cruilles a écrit :
> Hi Benoit,
>
> It's not a problem, if you create another component that permit the same
> treatment, I will modify my program.
>
> So, do you need an example of how I use the gb.option component ?
>
> Cordialement,
>
> Olivier Cruilles
> Mail: linu
Hi Benoit,
It's not a problem, if you create another component that permit the same
treatment, I will modify my program.
So, do you need an example of how I use the gb.option component ?
Cordialement,
Olivier Cruilles
Mail: linu...@club-internet.fr
Le 16 oct. 2012 à 11:47, Benoît Minisini a
Le 16/10/2012 11:44, Ian Haywood a écrit :
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 11:06 AM, Benoît Minisini
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> In the last revision, I added a new component 'gb.args', which replaces
>> the unmaintained 'gb.option'. By the way, does anyone use 'gb.option'?
> yep. Code can be moved across wit
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 11:06 AM, Benoît Minisini
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In the last revision, I added a new component 'gb.args', which replaces
> the unmaintained 'gb.option'. By the way, does anyone use 'gb.option'?
yep. Code can be moved across without too much work, but it creates a
problem as it me
Hi Benoit,
Yes, I use it and it very important in my project.
So what king of informations does you need to know about gb.options ? Of curse
if you need it.
Cordialement,
Olivier Cruilles
Mail: linu...@club-internet.fr
Le 16 oct. 2012 à 02:06, Benoît Minisini a écrit
:
> Hi,
>
> In the la
Hi,
In the last revision, I added a new component 'gb.args', which replaces
the unmaintained 'gb.option'. By the way, does anyone use 'gb.option'?
The goal of this component made in Gambas is analyzing the command-line
arguments and return the value of options.
It works like that:
' Start the
14 matches
Mail list logo
