Re: [Gambas-user] New JIT Compiler, Trying.... QUATER

2012-05-23 Thread Emil Lenngren
The thing is that llvm optimizes away that loop (at least on my 64-bit computer), so it should take 0 seconds ;) 2012/5/24 Benoît Minisini > Le 24/05/2012 02:32, Ru Vuott a écrit : > >> > >> CPU must be at 100% (on one core) in both case. The JIT > >> compiled > >> function is just faster. > >>

Re: [Gambas-user] New JIT Compiler, Trying.... QUATER

2012-05-23 Thread Benoît Minisini
Le 24/05/2012 02:32, Ru Vuott a écrit : >> >> CPU must be at 100% (on one core) in both case. The JIT >> compiled >> function is just faster. >> >> Just try with the FAST keyword, and without, and compare the >> execution time. >> >> -- >> Benoît Minisini >> >> > > I have 4 core. I tried "with" and

Re: [Gambas-user] New JIT Compiler, Trying.... QUATER

2012-05-23 Thread Ru Vuott
> > CPU must be at 100% (on one core) in both case. The JIT > compiled > function is just faster. > > Just try with the FAST keyword, and without, and compare the > execution time. > > -- > Benoît Minisini > > I have 4 core. I tried "with" and "without" the word: Fast, but one CPU stays on