On 07/27/2011 11:33 AM, Caveat wrote:
> Last time I looked this wasn't a mailing list dedicated exclusively to
> technical subjects, but a mailing list for Gambas developers to share
> ideas and have discussions. We're the kind of people that are most
> likely to be at risk from the crazy software
Last time I looked this wasn't a mailing list dedicated exclusively to
technical subjects, but a mailing list for Gambas developers to share
ideas and have discussions. We're the kind of people that are most
likely to be at risk from the crazy software patents situation.
I also added [OT] to the
On Wednesday 27 July 2011 08:53, Caveat wrote:
> Right here, it seems like HTC *IS* losing the battle against Apple over
> this very patent! As we all appear to agree, there's an abundance of
> prior art, so why the heck has the initial determination gone to Apple?
I don't run the list, but I'd r
On Wed, 2011-07-27 at 08:19 -0400, Rob wrote:
> That they were given it is sad, but if they were to try to enforce it
> against someone with enough money to make it worth their while, it's
> likely they would lose the patent.
http://fosspatents.blogspot.com/2011/07/itc-judge-finds-htc-in-infring
