> that's nice.
>
> Is this applied for Gambas2 also?
>
Of course not.
--
Benoît Minisini
--
Lotusphere 2011
Register now for Lotusphere 2011 and learn how
to connect the dots, take your collaborative environment
to th
that's nice.
Is this applied for Gambas2 also?
On Tue, 2010-12-14 at 09:16 +0100, Fabien Bodard wrote:
> good :)
>
> Le 14 décembre 2010 00:47, Benoît Minisini
> a écrit :
> >> Hi to all,
> >>
> >> i want to ask why there is not a modulus operator like % for example?
> >>
> >
> > The '%' operat
good :)
Le 14 décembre 2010 00:47, Benoît Minisini
a écrit :
>> Hi to all,
>>
>> i want to ask why there is not a modulus operator like % for example?
>>
>
> The '%' operator has been added as a synonymous for 'MOD' in revision #3362.
> The '%=' assignment operator has been added as well.
>
> Reg
> Hi to all,
>
> i want to ask why there is not a modulus operator like % for example?
>
The '%' operator has been added as a synonymous for 'MOD' in revision #3362.
The '%=' assignment operator has been added as well.
Regards,
--
Benoît Minisini
we will not spend the year ... Gambas will have a new symbol "%", it
will be the synonym operator "MOD" Like "\" is synonymous with "DIV",
thank you Benoit. As the operator is a long writing was old-fashioned
(more explicit), and a short writing more compact. The point on which
I would emphasize mo
Sorry about nitpicking... but modulo, integer division, addition,
subtraction are operators.
MOD, %, DIV, + , - are called operator symbols, or just symbols.
Jussi
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 14:05, user wrote:
> > In my opinion that is correct choice.
> >
> >Because if you remove DIV aka / operat
> Hi to all, and good morning.
>
> Dont worry you dont hurt me. :)
>
> I am not a C++ person not at all.
>
> Of course there is no need to turn Basic in C style.
>
> But i make a notice about DIV and MOD.
> The one of them has a synonmous as operator.
>
> The only thing i propose is to maintai
> In my opinion that is correct choice.
>
>Because if you remove DIV aka / operator there will be problem for
those
Because if you remove DIV aka \ operator there will be problem for those
(sorry mistake!)
> who used this in their programs in the past.
>
> In the other hand if you add % operato
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 6:40 PM, user wrote:
> i think Gambas concept is to keep a Basic style language as possible
> can. So an % operator is a foreign word for a Basic language.
Correct I remember MOD from the BBC Acorn's BASIC in the mid 1980s,
so for me it is fairly natural, strangely even af
In my opinion that is correct choice.
Because if you remove DIV aka / operator there will be problem for those
who used this in their programs in the past.
In the other hand if you add % operator as MOD the arithmetic operators
will be complete and whole in my opinion as i read the manual.
A las
Hi to all, and good morning.
Dont worry you dont hurt me. :)
I am not a C++ person not at all.
Of course there is no need to turn Basic in C style.
But i make a notice about DIV and MOD.
The one of them has a synonmous as operator.
The only thing i propose is to maintain a same "thinking" whil
user ha scritto:
> i am not the person that should answer but i will as i understood well
> as possible the concept of Gambas ..
>
> i think Gambas concept is to keep a Basic style language as possible
> can. So an % operator is a foreign word for a Basic language.
>
> >From the other hand it would
i am not the person that should answer but i will as i understood well
as possible the concept of Gambas ..
i think Gambas concept is to keep a Basic style language as possible
can. So an % operator is a foreign word for a Basic language.
>From the other hand it would be nice Gambas to be a bette
in another hand i don't understand the existance of the DIV
operator :/ ... if DIV exist why not ADD/MINUS/MULT ?
so ... i'm agree with user ... why not add the % synonymous ?
this is not consistent
2010/11/9 user :
> This question was created to me when i saw the MOD function in
> arithmet
This question was created to me when i saw the MOD function in
arithmetic operators without a an operator as the DIV has one.
http://gambasdoc.org/help/cat/arithop
On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 20:02 +0100, Benoît Minisini wrote:
> > I know that there is MOD
> >
> > but i ask this question cause i compa
Ok,
Thank you for your answer!
On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 20:02 +0100, Benoît Minisini wrote:
> > I know that there is MOD
> >
> > but i ask this question cause i compare the C++ operators with Gambas.
> >
> > As there is DIV and \ operator
> > i was questioned why MOD has not an operator as % for ex
> I know that there is MOD
>
> but i ask this question cause i compare the C++ operators with Gambas.
>
> As there is DIV and \ operator
> i was questioned why MOD has not an operator as % for example in C++
>
Because Gambas is a Basic, and the Basic languages I know do not use "%" as
operator
I know that there is MOD
but i ask this question cause i compare the C++ operators with Gambas.
As there is DIV and \ operator
i was questioned why MOD has not an operator as % for example in C++
On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 18:50 +0200, Jussi Lahtinen wrote:
> ?? There is Mod.
> http://gambasdoc.org/
El lun, 08-11-2010 a las 18:30 +0200, user escribió:
> Hi to all,
>
> i want to ask why there is not a modulus operator like % for example?
>
http://gambasdoc.org/help/lang/mod
--
Mauricio Baeza
10 años usando OpenOffice.org, libre, gratuito y seguro
___
Todo l
?? There is Mod.
http://gambasdoc.org/help/lang/mod
Jussi
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 18:30, user wrote:
> Hi to all,
>
> i want to ask why there is not a modulus operator like % for example?
>
>
>
> --
> The Next 800 Comp
Hi to all,
i want to ask why there is not a modulus operator like % for example?
--
The Next 800 Companies to Lead America's Growth: New Video Whitepaper
David G. Thomson, author of the best-selling book "Blueprint to a
21 matches
Mail list logo
