Le 28/01/2014 02:01, Benoît Minisini a écrit :
> Le 27/01/2014 21:39, Tobias Boege a écrit :
>> Hi Benoit,
>>
>> attached is a project that generates an "internal compiler error" with
>> this
>> usage of the New keyword:
>>
>> Public Sub Main()
>>New Boolean[]
>> End
>>
>> Actually, this is the
Le 27/01/2014 21:39, Tobias Boege a écrit :
> Hi Benoit,
>
> attached is a project that generates an "internal compiler error" with this
> usage of the New keyword:
>
> Public Sub Main()
>New Boolean[]
> End
>
> Actually, this is the project's whole code. What's wrong with it? Could we
> be abl
> I didn't mean to say something about Boolean[] or an Array but *any*
> creatable object.
>
OK, so if some object works completely independently without any need to be
accessed, then you could just write:
New MyNoNeedToBeManagedObject
And left it there to do it's job... well I'm not sure it's wo
On Tue, 28 Jan 2014, Jussi Lahtinen wrote:
> Maybe it's my sleep deprivation, but I can't understand connection between
> unreferenced array and this. How unreferenced array would help in this? By
> definition, if you can't refer to it, how you can use it?
>
> Jussi
>
Yeah, sorry, the Boolean[]
Maybe it's my sleep deprivation, but I can't understand connection between
unreferenced array and this. How unreferenced array would help in this? By
definition, if you can't refer to it, how you can use it?
Jussi
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 11:40 PM, Tobias Boege wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Jan 2014, Jus
On Mon, 27 Jan 2014, Tobias Boege wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Jan 2014, Jussi Lahtinen wrote:
> > Well ok, but I don't think that should be allowed syntax (at least I don't
> > see any usage for it).
> >
>
> I do: the PathWatch class in gb.inotify or generally every object like this:
>
> --8<-[ MyObject
On Mon, 27 Jan 2014, Jussi Lahtinen wrote:
> Well ok, but I don't think that should be allowed syntax (at least I don't
> see any usage for it).
>
I do: the PathWatch class in gb.inotify or generally every object like this:
--8<-[ MyObject.class ]-
Well ok, but I don't think that should be allowed syntax (at least I don't
see any usage for it).
Jussi
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 11:15 PM, Tobias Boege wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Jan 2014, Jussi Lahtinen wrote:
> > ??
> > That doesn't make any sense, what do you think it should do?
> >
> > > Public Su
On Mon, 27 Jan 2014, Jussi Lahtinen wrote:
> ??
> That doesn't make any sense, what do you think it should do?
>
> > Public Sub Main()
> > New Boolean[]
> > End
> >
It should create a Boolean[] and free it afterwards because there is no
reference to it.
--
"There's an old saying: Don't change
??
That doesn't make any sense, what do you think it should do?
Jussi
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 10:39 PM, Tobias Boege wrote:
> Hi Benoit,
>
> attached is a project that generates an "internal compiler error" with this
> usage of the New keyword:
>
> Public Sub Main()
> New Boolean[]
> End
>
>
Hi Benoit,
attached is a project that generates an "internal compiler error" with this
usage of the New keyword:
Public Sub Main()
New Boolean[]
End
Actually, this is the project's whole code. What's wrong with it? Could we
be able to do such a thing so that, e.g. PathWatch (gb.inotify) object
11 matches
Mail list logo
