I will try to change it but if I remember exactly, it was the snmpget
with more than one OIDs in the list that does not understand correctly
with the
EXEC command.
And it works perfectly with SHELL command.
Example: /usr/bin/snmpget - c public - v 2c 198.168.0.3
enterprises.ucdavis.52.10
> I tried the both solutions: SHELL and EXEC, but the parameters used
> are not the same for each command executed.
>
> So, after many tries, I the EXEC command give me errors during
> execution because it's very difficult to play with the character " or
> ' in the command.
You just have to replac
I tried the both solutions: SHELL and EXEC, but the parameters used
are not the same for each command executed.
So, after many tries, I the EXEC command give me errors during
execution because it's very difficult to play with the character " or
' in the command.
I know that the EXEC command
> I measure the time to execute 730 snmpget commands started as process
> (SHELL command) in a Gambas program.
Why do you use SHELL to run snmpget? It runs the command inside "/bin/sh",
which is very heavy.
>
>
> In the first time I start 20 processes in the same time and when one
> is finished,
My question is: are you really testing Gambas or kernel networking (snmp)??
-- Original Message ---
From: Olivier Cruilles
To: mailing list for gambas users
Sent: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 20:27:44 +0200
Subject: [Gambas-user] Gambas performances
> Hello Benoit,
>
> Just a
I measure the time to execute 730 snmpget commands started as process
(SHELL command) in a Gambas program.
In the first time I start 20 processes in the same time and when one
is finished, I start a new one to follow the list of requests
to execute.
I measure the time from the first process
> Hello Benoit,
>
> Just a question about performances of Gambas 2.14 on Fedora 10
> x86_32 (32bits)
>
> I'm trying my scheduler written in Gambas on Fedora 10 on 3
> differentes machines:
>
> 1) 1x Celeron 2.6 Ghz512Mb Ram (simple PC)
>
> Time to execute 730 snmp requests: around 49
Hello Benoit,
Just a question about performances of Gambas 2.14 on Fedora 10
x86_32 (32bits)
I'm trying my scheduler written in Gambas on Fedora 10 on 3
differentes machines:
1) 1x Celeron 2.6 Ghz512Mb Ram (simple PC)
Time to execute 730 snmp requests: around 49 sec
2) 1x
