It is difficult to have a wider discussion on this forum without being
accused of being off topic or having to elucidate to the n'th degree why
I would want to take a particular view or stance. So I have raised one
or two pertinent subjects to assist my plans which have not received any
response.
Le 20/09/2014 19:11, John Leake a écrit :
> Anyone know when the parser and compiler were last generated ?
>
The compiler was written by hand. For performance reasons if you want to
know why.
Regards,
--
Benoît Minisini
-
On Sat, 20 Sep 2014, John Leake wrote:
> Anyone know when the parser and compiler were last generated ?
>
What makes you so sure that the sources are generated? I don't know the
compiler at all (!) but these sources look hand-written, everywhere.
When I said "to produce [ bison/flex sources ] in
Anyone know when the parser and compiler were last generated ?
--
Slashdot TV. Video for Nerds. Stuff that Matters.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=160591471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
___
It the original files that generated the compiler are not available it
is too risky to reverse engineer them.
On 20/09/14 14:29, Tobias Boege wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Sep 2014, John Leake wrote:
>> Hi All,
>> Could anyone point me to the languages definitive specification as used
>> by yacc and lex ?
>
On Sat, 20 Sep 2014, John Leake wrote:
> Hi All,
> Could anyone point me to the languages definitive specification as used
> by yacc and lex ?
>
I think nobody can.
But the more I think about it, it should be possible to produce those files
in less than a week...
Regards,
Tobi
--
"There's an
Hi All,
Could anyone point me to the languages definitive specification as used
by yacc and lex ?
--
Slashdot TV. Video for Nerds. Stuff that Matters.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=160591471&iu=/4140/ostg
