Re: [Gambas-user] Gambas 3 advancement

2010-12-29 Thread Michael
I have done more experimentation with a date Valuebox. If "Expand" is set to false then no major problem but if the Valuebox is housed in a container which resizes it's children and "Expand" is set to True then the text is not visible. You can make it visible by having a large "Height" value and

Re: [Gambas-user] Gambas 3 advancement

2010-12-21 Thread Doriano Blengino
Benoît Minisini ha scritto: >> Benoît Minisini ha scritto: >> Pipes should not return EOF when the pipe is not closed. But they should return EOF when the other side closes. >>> Why ? >>> >> Because this is the way *all* unix routines work, and the only logica

Re: [Gambas-user] Gambas 3 advancement

2010-12-21 Thread Benoît Minisini
> > Note that for a socket, "there is date to read" does not mean the same > thing than for a pipe, because there is the network between two sides of a > socket. > Oops. Try again... Note that for a socket, "there is some data to read" does not mean the same thing than for a pipe, because ther

Re: [Gambas-user] Gambas 3 advancement

2010-12-21 Thread Benoît Minisini
> Benoît Minisini ha scritto: > >> Pipes should not return EOF when the pipe is not closed. But they should > >> return EOF when the other side closes. > > > > Why ? > > Because this is the way *all* unix routines work, and the only logical one. > > > EOF() actually means "there is nothing to re

Re: [Gambas-user] Gambas 3 advancement

2010-12-20 Thread Benoît Minisini
> 2010/12/19 Benoît Minisini : > > Tell me the important things I forgot, because I am sure I have forgotten > > things. > > > > Not the small bugs, but the features that may change the language syntax > > or the interface of some components. > > Hi Benoît. I think that a "mecanism" for automatic

Re: [Gambas-user] Gambas 3 advancement

2010-12-20 Thread Fabián Flores Vadell
2010/12/19 Benoît Minisini : > > Tell me the important things I forgot, because I am sure I have forgotten > things. > > Not the small bugs, but the features that may change the language syntax or > the interface of some components. Hi Benoît. I think that a "mecanism" for automatic and selective

Re: [Gambas-user] Gambas 3 advancement

2010-12-20 Thread Doriano Blengino
Benoît Minisini ha scritto: >> Pipes should not return EOF when the pipe is not closed. But they should >> return EOF when the other side closes. >> >> > Why ? > Because this is the way *all* unix routines work, and the only logical one. > EOF() actually means "there is nothing to read an

Re: [Gambas-user] Gambas 3 advancement

2010-12-19 Thread Benoît Minisini
> > Pipes should not return EOF when the pipe is not closed. But they should > return EOF when the other side closes. > Why ? EOF() actually means "there is nothing to read anymore", which is the important needed information. If Eof() returns TRUE only when the pipe is closed: 1) How do you

Re: [Gambas-user] Gambas 3 advancement

2010-12-19 Thread Doriano Blengino
Benoît Minisini ha scritto: > Hi, > > I have currently the feeling that I have to correctly fix the "ValueBox" > problem (the way it is implemented, and more generally the way compound > controls raise events), and then I will able to make a release candidate of > Gambas 3. > > Tell me the impor

[Gambas-user] Gambas 3 advancement

2010-12-19 Thread Benoît Minisini
Hi, I have currently the feeling that I have to correctly fix the "ValueBox" problem (the way it is implemented, and more generally the way compound controls raise events), and then I will able to make a release candidate of Gambas 3. Tell me the important things I forgot, because I am sure I