On 28/05/13 08:02, Tom wrote:
> On 5/27/2013 5:54 PM, richard terry wrote:
>> On 28/05/13 02:00, Tom wrote:
>>> On 5/27/2013 10:12 AM, Benoît Minisini wrote:
Le 23/05/2013 00:26, Richard Terry a écrit :
> Whilst on the topic of the IDE one long standing bug...
Please start a new threa
On 5/27/2013 5:54 PM, richard terry wrote:
> On 28/05/13 02:00, Tom wrote:
>> On 5/27/2013 10:12 AM, Benoît Minisini wrote:
>>> Le 23/05/2013 00:26, Richard Terry a écrit :
Whilst on the topic of the IDE one long standing bug...
>>> Please start a new thread when you change the topic of the c
On 28/05/13 02:00, Tom wrote:
> On 5/27/2013 10:12 AM, Benoît Minisini wrote:
>> Le 23/05/2013 00:26, Richard Terry a écrit :
>>> Whilst on the topic of the IDE one long standing bug...
>> Please start a new thread when you change the topic of the conversation!
>>
>>> ...is that at some
>>> point a
On 28/05/13 00:12, Benoît Minisini wrote:
> Le 23/05/2013 00:26, Richard Terry a écrit :
>> Whilst on the topic of the IDE one long standing bug...
> Please start a new thread when you change the topic of the conversation!
Sorry, I agree, it is misleading.
>
>> ...is that at some
>> point after hea
On 5/27/2013 10:12 AM, Benoît Minisini wrote:
> Le 23/05/2013 00:26, Richard Terry a écrit :
>> Whilst on the topic of the IDE one long standing bug...
> Please start a new thread when you change the topic of the conversation!
>
>> ...is that at some
>> point after heavy use highlighting a line (s
Le 23/05/2013 00:26, Richard Terry a écrit :
>
> Whilst on the topic of the IDE one long standing bug...
Please start a new thread when you change the topic of the conversation!
> ...is that at some
> point after heavy use highlighting a line (s) by clicking a thte start
> and dragging the mouse
