Re: [Gambas-user] CDE. An interesting packaging tool

2011-02-26 Thread Benoît Minisini
> So I imagine this has been forgotten and dropped by the wayside, but I have > found cde to be very useful in making my app work in opensolaris, > OpenIndiana, PC-BSD and some linux builds, mainly suse and ubuntu. > > > @Benoît > I think cde may be the best viable solution at packaging libraries

Re: [Gambas-user] CDE. An interesting packaging tool

2011-02-25 Thread Nicolas Koch
So I imagine this has been forgotten and dropped by the wayside, but I have found cde to be very useful in making my app work in opensolaris, OpenIndiana, PC-BSD and some linux builds, mainly suse and ubuntu. @Benoît I think cde may be the best viable solution at packaging libraries for specified

Re: [Gambas-user] CDE. An interesting packaging tool

2010-12-22 Thread Benoît Minisini
> IS there any movement on the Gambas3 packaging suite to compile and/or > include the runtime and libs for the various distributions? I also looked > at the CDE route and exceptions can be made to keep files to a minimum and > just run your app with cde gbr3 project.gambas > > I got minimal resu

Re: [Gambas-user] CDE. An interesting packaging tool

2010-12-22 Thread Demosthenes Koptsis
This subject was mentioned some time ago. Myself was very font of the idea to be a way to package the system libs for gambas projects together with executables. Some users said although a different opinion. This was that, it is good not to break the linux way of system libs existence. At windows

Re: [Gambas-user] CDE. An interesting packaging tool

2010-12-21 Thread Nicolas Koch
IS there any movement on the Gambas3 packaging suite to compile and/or include the runtime and libs for the various distributions? I also looked at the CDE route and exceptions can be made to keep files to a minimum and just run your app with cde gbr3 project.gambas I got minimal results though b

Re: [Gambas-user] CDE. An interesting packaging tool

2010-11-14 Thread Demosthenes Koptsis
yes this is better. i tried cde with gambas project and it copied all the files in cde-package included passwd /home directory and other files that application used. This feature should work only for libs and as an option for packagers not "an only way" method. This is my opinion. On Sun, 2010-

Re: [Gambas-user] CDE. An interesting packaging tool

2010-11-14 Thread Doriano Blengino
Benoît Minisini ha scritto: >> Although I'm not a gambas developer, I appreciate the idea. I would prefer >> to have all the must-haves packaged into single file, instead of fighting >> with unresolved package dependencies. It's better to have a myprogram.bin >> installer, than myprogram.rpm, mypro

Re: [Gambas-user] CDE. An interesting packaging tool

2010-11-14 Thread Benoît Minisini
> > > Although I'm not a gambas developer, I appreciate the idea. I would > > > prefer to have all the must-haves packaged into single file, instead of > > > fighting with unresolved package dependencies. It's better to have a > > > myprogram.bin installer, than myprogram.rpm, myprogram.deb... Mayb

Re: [Gambas-user] CDE. An interesting packaging tool

2010-11-14 Thread Benoît Minisini
> > Although I'm not a gambas developer, I appreciate the idea. I would > > prefer to have all the must-haves packaged into single file, instead of > > fighting with unresolved package dependencies. It's better to have a > > myprogram.bin installer, than myprogram.rpm, myprogram.deb... Maybe > > Be

Re: [Gambas-user] CDE. An interesting packaging tool

2010-11-14 Thread Benoît Minisini
> Although I'm not a gambas developer, I appreciate the idea. I would prefer > to have all the must-haves packaged into single file, instead of fighting > with unresolved package dependencies. It's better to have a myprogram.bin > installer, than myprogram.rpm, myprogram.deb... Maybe Benoit would a

Re: [Gambas-user] CDE. An interesting packaging tool

2010-11-13 Thread M. Cs.
Although I'm not a gambas developer, I appreciate the idea. I would prefer to have all the must-haves packaged into single file, instead of fighting with unresolved package dependencies. It's better to have a myprogram.bin installer, than myprogram.rpm, myprogram.deb... Maybe Benoit would argue bec

Re: [Gambas-user] CDE. An interesting packaging tool

2010-11-13 Thread Demosthenes Koptsis
i was thinking this before a couple of days. i was thinking how is it possible to make a package of a gambas project with all necessary libs but not all the Gambas IDE or Gambas language. And more, to package these files in a chroot like way, so to install the package in /opt independently. for

Re: [Gambas-user] CDE. An interesting packaging tool

2010-11-13 Thread Demosthenes Koptsis
Very very nice program indeed! I was looking something like that to make installation packages for my Gambas projects that include libs of Gambas and able to run without the whole IDE or the whole language. Another thing is that every package is self independent from system libs or other installa

[Gambas-user] CDE. An interesting packaging tool

2010-11-13 Thread Toni Rosa
Hi Gambas List, It's been a while since I last posted here. I came across this nice project: CDE (http://stanford.edu/~pgbovine/cde.html) and I thought of Gambas. It is a really interesting automatic packaging tool to share applications among different Linux distributions... It does so by analysing