On Sat, 2013-10-12 at 09:11 +0200, Benoît Minisini wrote:
> Le 12/10/2013 04:45, Bruce a écrit :
> > On Sat, 2013-10-12 at 12:51 +1030, Bruce wrote:
> >> Rev 5871 did something nasty to database fields that are dates (well for
> >> postgresql at least).
> >>
> >> Any date field is returned from any
Le 12/10/2013 04:45, Bruce a écrit :
> On Sat, 2013-10-12 at 12:51 +1030, Bruce wrote:
>> Rev 5871 did something nasty to database fields that are dates (well for
>> postgresql at least).
>>
>> Any date field is returned from any query (included using the connection
>> manager) as a null.
>>
>> Rev
On Sat, 2013-10-12 at 12:51 +1030, Bruce wrote:
> Rev 5871 did something nasty to database fields that are dates (well for
> postgresql at least).
>
> Any date field is returned from any query (included using the connection
> manager) as a null.
>
> Reverting to 5870 to check if it happens there.
Rev 5871 did something nasty to database fields that are dates (well for
postgresql at least).
Any date field is returned from any query (included using the connection
manager) as a null.
Reverting to 5870 to check if it happens there.
Bruce
(On our busiest day of the week!!! Aaaarr)
