Most people don't ask for clarification when they believe there's an insult in
there. Next time somebody calls you and ass I'd like to see if you clarify it
with them but yes we should kill this dead horse again. You're welcome to put
the last word if you'd like
Sent from TypeApp
On May 31,
My foul attitude comes from the belief that the original poster was insulting
me which he explained he used terminology that apparently did not cross over
from whatever culture to whatever culture. Although I do stand by my thought
that programmers just have bad attitudes on all sides. Thank you
> Or you could use terms that all peopleof all cultures understand ...
>
Unfortunately, there is no such thing.
> ... and stop beating the dead horse. You used some kind of terminology
> specific to one culture that was your mistake I took it as an insult my
> mistake. Now the question is does
On Thu, 31 May 2018, Steve G via Gambas-user wrote:
> If you really are so good, then prove me wrong and actually show it to me
> don't say oh it's here or it's there put it right out there and show it to
> me if you think I'm so stupid prove it by doing that. Otherwise shut up
> and just answer th
Or you could use terms that all peopleof all cultures understand and stop
beating the dead horse. You used some kind of terminology specific to one
culture that was your mistake I took it as an insult my mistake. Now the
question is does this keep going or do we realize that we both spoke poorly
Necromancing means act of rising very old thread back to life. It is not
name calling, it is not insult. It was just stating the bad habit. And the
old thread did contain the solution. You could have behaved and ask
elaboration to it.
Jussi
On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 1:59 AM, Steve G wrote:
> You
Btw, if you want to see practical example of one option what I explained
(or at least tried to), then look how Task is used in Fractal named example.
You can find it from software farm.
And here you can find proper internet etiquette.
https://www.youtube.com/user/commentiquette
Jussi
On Fri, Ju
You actually put an answer in earlier that makes sense something I will look
into. However your initial reply included name calling why don't you take a
look back at something called "necromancer". As you put it in your reply it was
very condescending and clearly meant to insult that is why you
> It is amazing how programmers are so petty. I went through and reread that
> thread and I don't see any answers in there to what I'm trying to do.
"You can write two separated gambas applications that communicate to each
other."
I explained it further with me second reply.
> By the way your
No, I actually figured out how to explain it. Hopefully.
Computer is state machine, means that it is always in one state at a time.
Nothing in it happens simultaneously. Everything is processed in line, but
order in the line can change. Even interruptions are processed in line,
even when they are c
It is amazing how programmers are so petty. I went through and reread that
thread and I don't see any answers in there to what I'm trying to do. By the
way your insult was really not much of an insult. However I will give you a
good one. You are a complete moron and socially inept. Instead of na
I don't know how to explain the issue shortly, if you are not familiar with
what state machine means. And if you do, I'm not sure what to explain
further.
However, here is practical answer to your problem. Gambas itself doesn't
need to be multi-threaded to achieve such things. You can simply use
k
Please read the whole thread you necromanced, you don't need Gambas to
support multi-threading for that.
Jussi
On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 12:27 AM, MacGyver via Gambas-user <
gambas-user@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> I will give you a real life example of the need for multithreading.
>
> project
I don't think I understood your reply or maybe there was no reply. If there was
a reply then I'd love to hear your ideas on how to take care of this issue.
Without threading.
Sent from TypeApp
On May 31, 2018, 13:37, at 13:37, "Benoît Minisini" wrote:
>Le 31/05/2018 à 23:27, MacGyver via Ga
Le 31/05/2018 à 23:27, MacGyver via Gambas-user a écrit :
I will give you a real life example of the need for multithreading.
project to monitor status of computers on a network. this is done with a
ping to each system from a timer. the result is either online or offline
depending on ping result
I will give you a real life example of the need for multithreading.
project to monitor status of computers on a network. this is done with a
ping to each system from a timer. the result is either online or offline
depending on ping results. The program is unresponsive to the user while
multiple pi
16 matches
Mail list logo
