On Mon, 2012-03-05 at 12:16 +0800, Ian Roper wrote:
> Could you use
> Exec ["xdg-open", Application.path &/ "myfile.pdf"]
>
> or is the bad practice ?
>
> Note # xdg-open is on most Linux Distros and will open a nominated file
> with the correct program if there is one installed for this purpose.
Could you use
Exec ["xdg-open", Application.path &/ "myfile.pdf"]
or is the bad practice ?
Note # xdg-open is on most Linux Distros and will open a nominated file
with the correct program if there is one installed for this purpose.
Regards,
Ian Roper ~ Perth - Western Australia.
On Sat, 2012-
Benoit,
some time also we had a discussion about Collection semantics. In Gambas
setting the member of a Collection to NULL is the same as deleting it. I
am not trying to re-open this debate, I accept the decision and have
written a class with the semantics Richard and I want: it can have NULL
mem
Le 04/03/2012 10:16, Benoît Minisini a écrit :
> Le 04/03/2012 02:23, Benoît Minisini a écrit :
>>
>> You are right, I didn't think about that. So the current design does not
>> work, and I don't have another one.
>>
>> I will remove GOSUB if it cannot be implemented in a right way. :-/
>>
>> Regar
Why not try:
RETURN label:
It looks like a function return value but "label:" can only be a label, yes
On 04/03/2012, Benoît Minisini wrote:
> Le 04/03/2012 17:35, Jussi Lahtinen a écrit :
>> Maybe there should be "GoBack" instead of "Return".
>> We already have "GoTo" and "GoSub", so I think i
Le 04/03/2012 17:35, Jussi Lahtinen a écrit :
> Maybe there should be "GoBack" instead of "Return".
> We already have "GoTo" and "GoSub", so I think it would be logical...
>
> Jussi
>
Yes, but RETURN is the historical syntax in Basic.
And I don't think it's a problem if you cannot return from the
Le 04/03/2012 15:23, Emil Lenngren a écrit :
> Nice, to me it looks like that design works ;)
>
> But I get a compile error:
> error: 'TRANS_GOTO' has no member named 'gosub'
>
> I assume the "share" folder was not commited to svn...
> When I add "bool gosub" to the gbc_trans_common.h, it works.
>
Maybe there should be "GoBack" instead of "Return".
We already have "GoTo" and "GoSub", so I think it would be logical...
Jussi
2012/3/4 Benoît Minisini
> Le 04/03/2012 02:23, Benoît Minisini a écrit :
> >
> > You are right, I didn't think about that. So the current design does not
> > work,
I think they can be useful. They both speed up the code and let you have
"functions" inside functions that have access to all the local variables.
/Emil
2012/3/4 Ru Vuott
>
> > But I get a compile error:
> > error: 'TRANS_GOTO' has no member named 'gosub'
>
> I confirm this problem.
>
>
> A que
> But I get a compile error:
> error: 'TRANS_GOTO' has no member named 'gosub'
I confirm this problem.
A question: Is this GOSUB really so "incredibly" useful ?
Regards
Vuott
--
Virtualization & Cloud Management Using
Change your preferences, do not use digest.
As you use gmail, you can create separated folder for gambas mailing list.
Jussi
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 12:56, John Rose wrote:
> An elementary question about this mailing list:
> Benoit told me "please *answer* mails that are in the same thread. Do
Nice, to me it looks like that design works ;)
But I get a compile error:
error: 'TRANS_GOTO' has no member named 'gosub'
I assume the "share" folder was not commited to svn...
When I add "bool gosub" to the gbc_trans_common.h, it works.
Now a little bug:
Now the compiler thinks that all labels
Benoit,
some time also we had a discussion about Collection semantics. In Gambas
setting the member of a Collection to NULL is the same as deleting it. I
am not trying to re-open this debate, I accept the decision and have
written a class with the semantics Richard and I want: it can have NULL
mem
An elementary question about this mailing list:
Benoit told me "please *answer* mails that are in the same thread. Do
not create a new mail each time, because then it is very difficult to
follow the talk.". I don't understand this. I don't receive an email
message each time someone posts to the Gam
Le 04/03/2012 02:23, Benoît Minisini a écrit :
>
> You are right, I didn't think about that. So the current design does not
> work, and I don't have another one.
>
> I will remove GOSUB if it cannot be implemented in a right way. :-/
>
> Regards,
>
Here is the only solution I found in revision #45
15 matches
Mail list logo
