Comment #8 on issue 185 by zachsmit...@gmail.com: Editing a line changes
font spacing
http://code.google.com/p/gambas/issues/detail?id=185
No, that didn't seem to change anything.
--
Keep Your Developer Skills Current
Updates:
Status: Accepted
Comment #7 on issue 185 by benoit.m...@gmail.com: Editing a line changes
font spacing
http://code.google.com/p/gambas/issues/detail?id=185
Is it better with revision #4404, if I disable font kerning?
---
Comment #6 on issue 185 by benoit.m...@gmail.com: Editing a line changes
font spacing
http://code.google.com/p/gambas/issues/detail?id=185
Maybe it is Qt 4.8 then... I have only Qt 4.7 with my Ubuntu.
--
Keep Your Dev
Comment #5 on issue 185 by zachsmit...@gmail.com: Editing a line changes
font spacing
http://code.google.com/p/gambas/issues/detail?id=185
My DPI setting is 92. I've made the DPI higher and lower and restarted
Gambas each time to see the result but it did not help. It makes the
edited tex
Hmmm... maybe there is also ambiguity.
Message is "This class does not exist in version 3.0.", which implies that
only the class is missing,
when in reality the whole component is missing.
Jussi
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 22:29, Jussi Lahtinen wrote:
> Yes, there is no ambiguity, but as we can
Yes, there is no ambiguity, but as we can see, in practice, some people get
confused.
'"For xxx See here" link' is also fine idea.
Personally this doesn't matter much to me as I know it now, but I think it
would be helpful to others.
Jussi
2012/1/17 Benoît Minisini
> Le 17/01/2012 20:55, J
I think a statement to the fact the gb.qt was replaced by gd.qt4 in Gambas
3 would stop any confusion. I do think that most readers would assume the
draw object no longer existed at all. The solution would be a "For xxx See
here" link and point people to the replacement via a link on the page.
Th
Le 17/01/2012 20:55, Jussi Lahtinen a écrit :
> Aaa... of course, Bill and I have clicked on:
> http://gambasdoc.org/help/comp/gb.qt/drawingarea?v3
>
> There is no Gambas 3 drawingarea in gb.qt, because there is no gb.qt, it's
> gb.qt4 now.
> Maybe redirection then?
>
> Jussi
>
Why redirecting? Th
Aaa... of course, Bill and I have clicked on:
http://gambasdoc.org/help/comp/gb.qt/drawingarea?v3
There is no Gambas 3 drawingarea in gb.qt, because there is no gb.qt, it's
gb.qt4 now.
Maybe redirection then?
Jussi
2012/1/17 Benoît Minisini
> Le 17/01/2012 19:47, Jussi Lahtinen a écrit :
> >
Le 17/01/2012 19:47, Jussi Lahtinen a écrit :
> Documentation of Gambas 3 is just not ready yet.
> Maybe there should be default text something like "Page is missing or this
> class does not exist in version 3.0.".
>
> Jussi
>
I don't know what you are talking about.
http://gambasdoc.org/help/com
Documentation of Gambas 3 is just not ready yet.
Maybe there should be default text something like "Page is missing or this
class does not exist in version 3.0.".
Jussi
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 16:00, Bill-Lancaster wrote:
>
> A search in http://gambasdoc.org/help/ for "DrawingArea" resulted i
2012/1/17 Rolf-Werner Eilert :
> Am 17.01.2012 16:27, schrieb Bill-Lancaster:
>>
>> Just tried opening a .ps file, "bad PDF Format" was the result!
>> Bill
>
> Ok - :-( it's a bit of a pity, but alas... maybe I'll find a way to make
> use of the pdf viewing capability :-)
in fact it's poppler capac
Le 17 janvier 2012 16:22, Benoît Minisini
a écrit :
> Le 17/01/2012 11:35, Kevin Fishburne a écrit :
>> On 01/17/2012 05:18 AM, Kevin Fishburne wrote:
>>> On 01/16/2012 02:33 AM, Benoît Minisini wrote:
Le 16/01/2012 08:05, Kevin Fishburne a écrit :
> On 01/16/2012 01:43 AM, Kevin Fishburn
Am 17.01.2012 16:27, schrieb Bill-Lancaster:
>
> Just tried opening a .ps file, "bad PDF Format" was the result!
> Bill
Ok - :-( it's a bit of a pity, but alas... maybe I'll find a way to make
use of the pdf viewing capability :-)
Regards
Rolf
-
Just tried opening a .ps file, "bad PDF Format" was the result!
Bill
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Document-viewing-in-3.0-tp33153744p33154883.html
Sent from the gambas-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---
Le 17/01/2012 11:35, Kevin Fishburne a écrit :
> On 01/17/2012 05:18 AM, Kevin Fishburne wrote:
>> On 01/16/2012 02:33 AM, Benoît Minisini wrote:
>>> Le 16/01/2012 08:05, Kevin Fishburne a écrit :
On 01/16/2012 01:43 AM, Kevin Fishburne wrote:
> Why would I get the runtime error "Mathemati
Am 17.01.2012 13:25, schrieb Bill-Lancaster:
>
> What is the best way to view documents in Gambas 3.0?
> I believe the drawingarea control is not available.
> In particular I wish to view .pnm and .pdf files. The new pdf viewer is
> fine for pdf files.
Oh :-) there is a pdf viewer now? Is it abl
A search in http://gambasdoc.org/help/ for "DrawingArea" resulted in this
message:-
"This class does not exist in version 3.0. "
I don't really know what that means because I can use DrawingArea in my
Gambas 3.0 project OK.
So - problem solved
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nab
I wish to display the content of .pnm files in a form
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Document-viewing-in-3.0-tp33153744p33154217.html
Sent from the gambas-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
2012/1/17 Bill-Lancaster :
>
> What is the best way to view documents in Gambas 3.0?
hem... i don't understand what you wan't to know :/
> I believe the drawingarea control is not available.
> In particular I wish to view .pnm and .pdf files. The new pdn'tf viewer is
> fine for pdf files.
> --
>
What is the best way to view documents in Gambas 3.0?
I believe the drawingarea control is not available.
In particular I wish to view .pnm and .pdf files. The new pdf viewer is
fine for pdf files.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Document-viewing-in-3.0-tp33153744p3315374
On 01/17/2012 05:18 AM, Kevin Fishburne wrote:
> On 01/16/2012 02:33 AM, Benoît Minisini wrote:
>> Le 16/01/2012 08:05, Kevin Fishburne a écrit :
>>> On 01/16/2012 01:43 AM, Kevin Fishburne wrote:
Why would I get the runtime error "Mathematic error" in this function:
Public Function
On 01/16/2012 02:33 AM, Benoît Minisini wrote:
> Le 16/01/2012 08:05, Kevin Fishburne a écrit :
>> On 01/16/2012 01:43 AM, Kevin Fishburne wrote:
>>> Why would I get the runtime error "Mathematic error" in this function:
>>>
>>> Public Function Distance(x1 As Single, y1 As Single, x2 As Single, y2
Le 17/01/2012 08:48, Rolf-Werner Eilert a écrit :
> Am 12.01.2012 06:36, schrieb Benoît Minisini:
>> Le 10/01/2012 08:19, Rolf-Werner Eilert a écrit :
>>> Am 09.01.2012 13:39, schrieb Benoît Minisini:
>
> Ok, I think I understand: With the help of ScrollX and ScrollY I have to
> decide
24 matches
Mail list logo
