Working here too last svn 4192 on oneiric :)
Thanks
--
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a
definitive record of customers, application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity
On 10/09/2011 07:38 AM, Dag-Jarle Johansen wrote:
> Thank you Kevin,
>
> it's frustrating right now. Have to swith to Win to get the Informatisons
> and then back Ubuntu to try it out.
> What Card do you have?
My lspci output shows:
Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL8111/8168B PCI Express Gigabi
On 10/09/2011 07:26 PM, Benoît Minisini wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here is the release of the fifth release candidate of Gambas 3.
>
> Of course there were big bugs since the RC4, and a RC5 is needed. :-/
>
> All the details about this release is on the web site.
>
> And if I don't get big bugs again, this R
On Tue, 2011-10-11 at 01:58 +0200, Benoît Minisini wrote:
> > In the first line we see that db.Error=0 instead of the driver error
> > code, I would have expected 1022 (mysql error: "Error: 1022 SQLSTATE:
> > 23000 (ER_DUP_KEY) Message: Can't write; duplicate key in table '%s').
>
> I don't know
On Tue, 2011-10-11 at 01:58 +0200, Benoît Minisini wrote:
> You have no Error.Backtrace because you are not inside an error
> handler, but
> inside normal code. Use System.Backtrace instead.
Aha! Me=Duuumb!
Thanks
Bruce
-
> Hi Benoît,
>
> I don't raise these as bugs because they are only annoyances and don't
> (specifically) stop things from working.
>
> I have this code (which works fine when things are fine) but has a few
> quirks when a database error occurs. I made a simple test that just
> calls this and tri
Hi Benoît,
I don't raise these as bugs because they are only annoyances and don't
(specifically) stop things from working.
I have this code (which works fine when things are fine) but has a few
quirks when a database error occurs. I made a simple test that just
calls this and tries to add the sa
Comment #1 on issue 127 by mun...@googlemail.com: Gambas 3.0 RC5 compile
issues
http://code.google.com/p/gambas/issues/detail?id=127
Issue can be closed, compiled fine now with new package
(http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=28209404)
openSUSE binaries can be found here:
htt
On Mon, 2011-10-10 at 21:47 +0200, Benoît Minisini wrote:
> I have just updated the svn repository too, so you can try again from it now.
>
> Regards,
>
Compiled fine on my Ubuntu 64 11.04. (as it has in the past)
Thanks!
John
El 10/10/11 21:47, Benoît Minisini escribió:
>>>
>>> Did you download the source package from sourceforge?
>>
>> No, I did svn co, sorry. @Jussi, logs are missing because it was exactly
>> the same as before. (user EA7DFH at 20:54h).
>> I only want to state that revision #4191 doesn't compile.
>>
>
> >
> > Did you download the source package from sourceforge?
>
> No, I did svn co, sorry. @Jussi, logs are missing because it was exactly
> the same as before. (user EA7DFH at 20:54h).
> I only want to state that revision #4191 doesn't compile.
>
> I will download the source package and I'll tr
El 10/10/11 21:33, Benoît Minisini escribió:
>> El 10/10/11 21:03, gam...@users.sourceforge.net escribió:
>>> Revision: 4191
>>>
>>> http://gambas.svn.sourceforge.net/gambas/?rev=4191&view=rev
>>>
>>> Author: gambas
>>> Date: 2011-10-10 19:03:05 + (Mon, 10 Oct 2011)
>>> Log Mess
> El 10/10/11 21:03, gam...@users.sourceforge.net escribió:
> > Revision: 4191
> >
> > http://gambas.svn.sourceforge.net/gambas/?rev=4191&view=rev
> >
> > Author: gambas
> > Date: 2011-10-10 19:03:05 + (Mon, 10 Oct 2011)
> > Log Message:
> > ---
> > [GB.FORM]
> > * BUG
Compilation logs are missing!
Jussi
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 22:27, Jesus wrote:
> El 10/10/11 21:03, gam...@users.sourceforge.net escribió:
> > Revision: 4191
> > http://gambas.svn.sourceforge.net/gambas/?rev=4191&view=rev
> > Author: gambas
> > Date: 2011-10-10 19:03:05 +
El 10/10/11 21:03, gam...@users.sourceforge.net escribió:
> Revision: 4191
> http://gambas.svn.sourceforge.net/gambas/?rev=4191&view=rev
> Author: gambas
> Date: 2011-10-10 19:03:05 + (Mon, 10 Oct 2011)
> Log Message:
> ---
> [GB.FORM]
> * BUG: Fix compilation of gb.form
> >
> > If anyone has an idea about why it does not compile anymore on some
> > environments, I will be happy
>
> There is a Component=gb.form.dialog
> line in the project file of the gb.form component.
>
> ++
>
Yep, I saw it. I have just uploaded a fixed source package to sourceforge.
--
Be
Le lundi 10 octobre 2011 19:44:40, Benoît Minisini a écrit :
> > Le dimanche 9 octobre 2011 19:28:07, Benoît Minisini a écrit :
> > > > I get the same problem with oneiric today...
> > > > I can't use gambas3
> > > > Henri
> > > >
> > > > Le 09/10/2011 17:20, John Spikowski a écrit :
> > > > > On
> El 10/10/11 19:44, Benoît Minisini escribió:
> > If anyone has an idea about why it does not compile anymore on some
> > environments, I will be happy!
>
> Sorry, no idea, but here is my fail log if it helps. Seems quite
> different from last seen.
>
> Revision #4190 in a *fresh* Linux Mint 10
> Le dimanche 9 octobre 2011 19:28:07, Benoît Minisini a écrit :
> > > I get the same problem with oneiric today...
> > > I can't use gambas3
> > > Henri
> > >
> > > Le 09/10/2011 17:20, John Spikowski a écrit :
> > > > On Sat, 2011-10-08 at 21:13 -0700, John Spikowski wrote:
> > > >> || Unable to
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Version Type-Bug Priority-Medium OpSys-Any Dist-Any Arch-Any
Desktop-Any GUI-Any
New issue 127 by mun...@googlemail.com: Gambas 3.0 RC5 compile issues
http://code.google.com/p/gambas/issues/detail?id=127
1) Describe the problem.
Gambas 3.0 RC5 compile errors.
G
Le dimanche 9 octobre 2011 19:28:07, Benoît Minisini a écrit :
> > I get the same problem with oneiric today...
> > I can't use gambas3
> > Henri
> >
> > Le 09/10/2011 17:20, John Spikowski a écrit :
> > > On Sat, 2011-10-08 at 21:13 -0700, John Spikowski wrote:
> > >> || Unable to compile gb.form
21 matches
Mail list logo
