On Sun, 2011-07-24 at 00:32 +0200, tobias wrote:
> On 24.07.2011 00:11, Benoît Minisini wrote:
> >>> I don't know what you are talking about. I was sending a fixed project
> >>> for Demosthene. Please send your project so that I can take a look at
> >>> it!
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >> oh god, i didn'
On 07/23/2011 02:18 PM, Kevin Fishburne wrote:
> Just caught something new:
>
> /bin/sed: can't read /usr/lib/libfreetype.la: No such file or directory
> libtool: link: `/usr/lib/libfreetype.la' is not a valid libtool archive
> make[4]: *** [gb.sdl.la] Error 1
> make[4]: Leaving directory
> `/home/
On 24.07.2011 00:11, Benoît Minisini wrote:
>>> I don't know what you are talking about. I was sending a fixed project
>>> for Demosthene. Please send your project so that I can take a look at
>>> it!
>>>
>>> Regards,
>> oh god, i didn't notice the attachment... it really works. ah, i see
>> Lof()
> > I don't know what you are talking about. I was sending a fixed project
> > for Demosthene. Please send your project so that I can take a look at
> > it!
> >
> > Regards,
>
> oh god, i didn't notice the attachment... it really works. ah, i see
> Lof() returns 0 on stdin, of course...
> but the
On 23.07.2011 20:29, nando wrote:
> Ok, so the following line...
>
>DIM Q AS NEW myClass[5]
>
> would need...
>
>FOR i = 0 TO 4
> myClass[i] = NEW myClass
>NEXT
>
>
> to instantiate each myClass object.
>
> The _init would then execute creating the string objects
>
> Does this line
Ok, so the following line...
DIM Q AS NEW myClass[5]
would need...
FOR i = 0 TO 4
myClass[i] = NEW myClass
NEXT
to instantiate each myClass object.
The _init would then execute creating the string objects
Does this line...
myClass[5] = NULL
do a deep unreference to the embedded
Does not the following line make the class "_init" execute with
each new instance of the class?
DIM Q AS NEW myClass[5]' constructor executes 5 times
Then, with each new instance there is the NEW object array with HELLO 100 times
When the reference to myClass is gone, as in:
On 07/23/2011 04:24 AM, Kevin Fishburne wrote:
> Everythings seems to work up to the end when I receive this:
>
> Making install in gb.sdl
> make[1]: Entering directory
> `/home/kevinfishburne/Desktop/gb3/trunk/gb.sdl'
> Making install in src
> make[2]: Entering directory
> `/home/kevinfishburne/
> btw, there are no stream objects for the 3 standard fds, just interfaces?
ok, found them in the File object
--
Storage Efficiency Calculator
This modeling tool is based on patent-pending intellectual property that
has b
> I don't know what you are talking about. I was sending a fixed project for
> Demosthene. Please send your project so that I can take a look at it!
>
> Regards,
>
oh god, i didn't notice the attachment... it really works. ah, i see
Lof() returns 0 on stdin, of course...
but there is something i
> On 23.07.2011 17:59, Benoît Minisini wrote:
> > No, read tobias' answer. Here is a fixed project.
> >
> > Note that if you run your project from the IDE, what you type inside the
> > debugger output window will be sent to the process, but you won't have
> > the behaviour of a true terminal.
> >
On 23.07.2011 17:59, Benoît Minisini wrote:
> No, read tobias' answer. Here is a fixed project.
>
> Note that if you run your project from the IDE, what you type inside the
> debugger output window will be sent to the process, but you won't have the
> behaviour of a true terminal.
>
> To run your p
> i am sure that there is a bug.
>
> Please see the project.
>
No, read tobias' answer. Here is a fixed project.
Note that if you run your project from the IDE, what you type inside the
debugger output window will be sent to the process, but you won't have the
behaviour of a true terminal.
T
On 23.07.2011 16:15, Demosthenes Koptsis wrote:
> i am sure that there is a bug.
>
> Please see the project.
why should it be a bug? it looks more like a design issue but that's
just a thought...
so, you use sBuf as a global variable this is the errors reason because
in this case it actually is a
i am sure that there is a bug.
Please see the project.
On Sat, 2011-07-23 at 09:38 +0200, tobias wrote:
> hi,
>
> >> Public Sub Application_Read()
> >>
> >> Dim sBuf As String
> >>
> >> Read #Last, sBuf, Lof(Last)
> >>
> > here i get again error for Read #Last
> > "Dynamic symbols canno
On 23.07.2011 15:28, Benoît Minisini wrote:
>> Question:
>>
>> Assume I have an instance of class myclass dimed as 'myclass1'
>> and I want to clone all the data to NEW myclass2
>>
>> The syntax may be something like:
>>
>> myclass2 = NEW myclass 'create instance
>> myclass2.clone(myclass1) 'clon
> Question:
>
> Assume I have an instance of class myclass dimed as 'myclass1'
> and I want to clone all the data to NEW myclass2
>
> The syntax may be something like:
>
> myclass2 = NEW myclass 'create instance
> myclass2.clone(myclass1) 'clone/copy
>
> I do realize that:
> myclass2 = myclas
> Question:
>
> If I have a class 'myClass' with the following:
>
> DIM k = NEW OBJECT[100]
>
> PUBLIC SUB _init()
>
>DIM i AS INTEGER
>
>FOR i = 1 TO 100
> k[i] = NEW STRING[] 'add a string array
> k[i].add("HELLO")'add one element with
hi,
>> Public Sub Application_Read()
>>
>> Dim sBuf As String
>>
>> Read #Last, sBuf, Lof(Last)
>>
> here i get again error for Read #Last
> "Dynamic symbols cannot be used in static function"
>
> is this a bug?
it works fine for me?
--
19 matches
Mail list logo
