Well this probably isn't very interesting but I also updated the savannah
project for defrag.
For those that still remember it, it is at:
http://www.nongnu.org/free-defrag/
and
http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/free-defrag
Imre
dosfsck is 32-bit. Defrag could be too (especially a version which
supports FAT32).
On 9/16/06, Imre Leber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> What doesn't stop to amaze me is that this project is so completely oposed
> to anything 32bit. But when it comes down to it you all complain that things
> don
Hi,
It seems that the latest version of defrag is not fully stable.
90% of the defragmentation code has been rewritten and it seems that even after
2 months of testing it doesn't work correctly.
I will look into it. Make a new release and then make it more like the windows
nt defragmentation A
I guess it would probably be wise to only allow "unfragment files only" method
on FAT32.
Even if you could get 1 Gb an hour for a defragmentation. It would still take
160 hours to defragment a 160Gb drive.
I don't think anyone could wait 10 days to defragment his computer.
Imre
---
Imre Leber wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Florian Xaver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Tuesday, August 8, 2006 12:36 PM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [Freedos-devel] defrag
>>
>>
>> I want to te
Imre Leber schrieb:
> You can find it at http://users.telenet.be/imre/FreeDOS/DEFRAG10.ZIP
Doh, I should have had a look at it before posting. The source is
included, so please disregard and completely ignore my last message :)
Best regards,
Andre
Imre Leber schrieb:
> You can find it at http://users.telenet.be/imre/FreeDOS/DEFRAG10.ZIP
> Be warned, it can be slow in most methods. "Unfragment files only" works
> pretty descent however, this is for most disks, the default method.
Stability comes first. We can think about optimizing when t
>-Original Message-
>From: Florian Xaver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, August 8, 2006 12:36 PM
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: Re: [Freedos-devel] defrag
>
>
>I want to test it - could you please post a URL, where I can download i
I want to test it - could you please post a URL, where I can download it?
Thanks
Flo
On Tue, 08 Aug 2006 09:15:59 +0200, Imre Leber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I have made all my changes to support FAT32 in defrag. Just needs to be
> tested.
>
> But I see that my previous version (1.0) w
I meant it wasn't on ibiblio :-)
Imre
>-Original Message-
>From: Blair Campbell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, August 8, 2006 09:18 AM
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: Re: [Freedos-devel] defrag
>
>It will be in, I just didn'
It will be in, I just didn't get to adding it at that time (I wanted
to make sure that things didn't fail horrilbly like they did for the
previous version).
On 8/8/06, Imre Leber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have made all my changes to support FAT32 in defrag. Just needs to be
> tested.
>
> But
I have made all my changes to support FAT32 in defrag. Just needs to be tested.
But I see that my previous version (1.0) was not picked up.
Is there any specific reason?
I could understand if it is not going to be in FreeDOS 1, altough it is highly
recommended.
Imre
---
> One will be the version 1, stable. Same speed, no FAT support. A rather flat
> in your face screen problem with large disks will be fixed in this release
> though, (the one where the screen would be completely filled when you did an
> "unfragment files only" defragmentation).
>
Sounds great!
By now, you are all just wandering what happened to defrag version 1.
Well, I am working on defrag.
There will be two versions out shortly.
One will be the version 1, stable. Same speed, no FAT support. A rather flat in
your face screen problem with large disks will be fixed in this release tho
> There is an alternative that is both easy and already working: dosfsck.
> I have been using it and it apears to be working. (is is in djgpp) The
> pnly prople is that there was some fixes to the working release that I
> don't remember who did and where they are.
> All that is needed is to all t
Eric Auer escreveu:
> Hi Alain, Blair,
> of course I had already mailed Alain off-list to tell
> him about his misunderstanding. And I HAD been thinking
> about whether I should CC you to tell you that I have
> already told him. Oh well. 2 more one-liner mails on
> the list which were only interes
And check eric's auersoft page somewhere for the dosfsck updates :-).
--
Fall is my favorite season in Los Angeles, watching the birds change
color and fall from the trees.
David Letterman (1947 - )
See ya
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff do
dosfsck doesn't do defragging, sorry. dosfsck is an alternative to
_chkdsk_ :-).
On 6/30/06, Alain M. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There is an alternative that is both easy and already working: dosfsck.
>
> I have been using it and it apears to be working. (is is in djgpp) The
> pnly prople is th
There is an alternative that is both easy and already working: dosfsck.
I have been using it and it apears to be working. (is is in djgpp) The
pnly prople is that there was some fixes to the working release that I
don't remember who did and where they are.
All that is needed is to all that info
On Mon, 7 Jun 2004 09:20:58 +0200 (MEST), you wrote:
Sorry everyone, last post I don't have the details.
>Johnson told me on ICQ that he tried to DEFRAG a FAT32 drive.
>Very simple explanation of his problem ;-).
Symptom:
Defrag under TUI: red alert pop up and show "Undefined Problem"
Defrag us
>Hi,
>
>DEFRAG refuse to work on my hard disk, but under TUI it didn't show
>the reason, just pop up a red alert and quit. I've to find the real
>problem using command line, is the error reporting part still not
>implemented?
>
Error reporting is mostly implemented, meaning that when you run out o
Hi,
DEFRAG refuse to work on my hard disk, but under TUI it didn't show
the reason, just pop up a red alert and quit. I've to find the real
problem using command line, is the error reporting part still not
implemented?
And when I want to fix the problem with DOSFSCK 2.8 (I tried the
latest versio
22 matches
Mail list logo
