ion and questions for FreeDOS developers.
Subject: Re: [Freedos-devel] Python on freedos.
MicroPython has a target for freedos:
https://github.com/micropython/micropython/blob/master/ports/unix/Makefile#L229
I don't know if it builds. It is too late to find out for me.
On Tue, 29 Jan 201
On 1/29/19 10:12 PM, Rugxulo wrote:
I know Python 3 is heavily recommended, but I don't think 2.x is
horribly useless. (Similarly, we formerly had DJGPP support for Ruby
1.8.x, which actually was "mostly" standardized in ISO 30170, but no
1.9.x or newer builds.)
Python is the language, that i
MicroPython has a target for freedos:
https://github.com/micropython/micropython/blob/master/ports/unix/Makefile#L229
I don't know if it builds. It is too late to find out for me.
On Tue, 29 Jan 2019 at 23:51, Rugxulo wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2019, 4:40 PM Matej Horvat >
>> On Tue, 29 J
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 29, 2019, 4:40 PM Matej Horvat On Tue, 29 Jan 2019 23:20:21 +0100, Rugxulo wrote:
>
> > There also was a guy, a few years ago, who was building ("Lightning")
> > Python for Win32 via OpenWatcom. I never tried it, but that would
> > probably
> > build for DOS/32-bit. Even the Win3
On Tue, 29 Jan 2019 23:20:21 +0100, Rugxulo wrote:
There also was a guy, a few years ago, who was building ("Lightning")
Python for Win32 via OpenWatcom. I never tried it, but that would
probably
build for DOS/32-bit. Even the Win32 .EXE almost certainly runs under HX
in
DOS. So maybe you
Hi again,
On Tue, Jan 29, 2019, 3:57 PM Pär Moberg I am looking for Python 3 since then I only need to learn python 3 to
> program on Raspberry Pi (with GPIO and GUI), My desktop (with GUI),
> CircuitPython (with GPIO) and DOS (with ?).
>
> So that is why I want Python 3/CircuitPython.
>
There a
I am looking for Python 3 since then I only need to learn python 3 to
program on Raspberry Pi (with GPIO and GUI), My desktop (with GUI),
CircuitPython (with GPIO) and DOS (with ?).
So that is why I want Python 3/CircuitPython.
On Tue, 29 Jan 2019 at 22:36, Rugxulo wrote:
>
> Hi, just to discuss
Hi, just to discuss a bit off-topic (well, non-Python) programming
On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 9:09 AM Pär Moberg wrote:
>
> Is there a python 3 implementation for dos?
> I saw circuitpython and micropython and thought that they would be portable
> to dos since
> they run on quite limited hardw
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 9:56 AM Bart Oldeman wrote:
>
> no, DOS support was bitrotted and then removed for Python 3.5
> (https://bugs.python.org/issue22591) in 2014. Newest full Python you
> can get is Python 2.4.2 at http://www.caddit.net/pythond/, but that's
> a long way before python 3.
>
On 1/26/2019 5:35 AM, stecdose wrote:
Just doing a joke, *dont* take it serious:
On 1/25/19 9:31 PM, Ralf Quint wrote:
Better getting used a real programming language...
Batch?
Never underestimate the power of simple... :-P
Ralf ;-)
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast a
Just doing a joke, *dont* take it serious:
On 1/25/19 9:31 PM, Ralf Quint wrote:
Better getting used a real programming language...
Batch?
Nils
___
Freedos-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/li
On 1/25/2019 7:08 AM, Pär Moberg wrote:
Hi,
Is there a python 3 implementation for dos?
I saw circuitpython and micropython and thought that they would be
portable to dos since they run on quite limited hardware, but if there
already is a py3 port it would be unnecessary for my purpose.
My pur
Hi Pär,
no, DOS support was bitrotted and then removed for Python 3.5
(https://bugs.python.org/issue22591) in 2014. Newest full Python you
can get is Python 2.4.2 at http://www.caddit.net/pythond/, but that's
a long way before python 3.
It works, I used it a long time ago.
Indeed you'll have to l
Hi,
Is there a python 3 implementation for dos?
I saw circuitpython and micropython and thought that they would be portable
to dos since they run on quite limited hardware, but if there already is a
py3 port it would be unnecessary for my purpose.
My purpose is to run python 3 on dos.
_
14 matches
Mail list logo
