Re: [Freedos-devel] EBDA

2004-04-27 Thread tom ehlert
BO> On Mon, 26 Apr 2004, Bart wrote: BO> "Some (especially embedded) applications don't use the DOS memory manager BO> but assume all the memory past that given to them by DOS is free for BO> use. " BO> .. BO> Obvious reply: BO> Most users don't use "Some (especially embedded) applications". And

Re: [Freedos-devel] EBDA

2004-04-26 Thread Bart Oldeman
On Mon, 26 Apr 2004, tom ehlert wrote: > BO> MSDOS 7.10 does move the EBDA though. What MSDOS are we looking at now -- > BO> the FAT16 kernel says 5.0, and the FAT32 says 7.10 ? > > MSDOS 7.1 doesn't move it on F5 (or ctrl-F5 ? should this depend on > the kernel version ?), but seems to move in h

Re: [Freedos-devel] EBDA

2004-04-26 Thread tom ehlert
Hello Bart, >> Checking MSDOS 6.2, the kernel doesn't move the EBDA if no UMB is >> found. BO> MSDOS 7.10 does move the EBDA though. What MSDOS are we looking at now -- BO> the FAT16 kernel says 5.0, and the FAT32 says 7.10 ? it's not a matter of reported kernel version - and I don't care about

Re: [Freedos-devel] EBDA

2004-04-26 Thread Bart Oldeman
On Mon, 26 Apr 2004, tom ehlert wrote: > Checking MSDOS 6.2, the kernel doesn't move the EBDA if no UMB is > found. MSDOS 7.10 does move the EBDA though. What MSDOS are we looking at now -- the FAT16 kernel says 5.0, and the FAT32 says 7.10 ? > in the default setting, moving the EBDA doesn't sav

[Freedos-devel] EBDA

2004-04-26 Thread tom ehlert
Checking MSDOS 6.2, the kernel doesn't move the EBDA if no UMB is found. moving the EBDA makes most sense anyway, if it's moved to upper (UMB) memory) So I would recommend to disable move EBDA by default, or to move it only if UMB space can be allocated for it. in the default setting, moving the