> - all 1.0 packages in fdpkg format thrown on one big pile
> and taken from the 1.0 distro
Those are here:
http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/micro/pc-stuff/freedos/files/distributions/1.0/pkgs/
>
> - various packages in more-or-less fdpkg format sorted
> nicely by category which is probably what Usul
> http://www.freedos.org/cgi-bin/lsm.cgi?mode=lsm&lsm=util/fdav.lsm
>
> And I cannot find the file.
> http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/micro/pc-stuff/freedos/files/util/system/
The directory is
http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/micro/pc-stuff/freedos/files/util/system/clamav/
.
> per the freedos lsm webpage
Hi,
Usul:
>> When I am reviewing current files to check to see if there has been a change
>> and I find a current file (1.0) that is not in the correct format should I
>> redo
>> it in the correct format?
Blair:
> Which packages are you talking about?
> Oh btw, when I released 1.0 I used a shel
Blair,
I was checking c-lock but downloaded clock instead.
the zip for clock that I had downloaded did not have an appinfo
directory. I got that from the "current" directory on the main ftp
site.
Also,
I am checking
http://www.freedos.org/cgi-bin/lsm.cgi?mode=lsm&lsm=util/fdav.lsm
And I cannot f
> When I am reviewing current files to check to see if there has been a change
> and I find a current file (1.0) that is not in the correct format should I
> redo
> it in the correct format?
Which packages are you talking about?
Oh btw, when I released 1.0 I used a shell script to auto-package th
When I am reviewing current files to check to see if there has been a change
and I find a current file (1.0) that is not in the correct format should I redo
it in the correct format?
usul
--
__
