Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS EDIT fork

> On May 7, 2025, at 3:58 PM, Bernd Böckmann via Freedos-devel > wrote: > > You may download it from [1]. It is 449k as it contains debug info... > > [1]: https://nextcloud.iww.rwth-aachen.de/index.php/s/jdggYg2igeDSMQF > > Bernd Should this be an “unstable” update to FreeDOS Edit and on th

[Freedos-devel] Invoke command doesn't work! [Solved]

Hello! Thank you! My installation in the DOSBOX Staging has access to the network and I got to install via repository ... Everaldo P.S.: network now it works on FreeDOS 1.4 ... *Re: [Freedos-devel] Invoke command doesn't work! * Fro

Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS EDIT fork

You may download it from [1]. It is 449k as it contains debug info... [1]: https://nextcloud.iww.rwth-aachen.de/index.php/s/jdggYg2igeDSMQF Bernd > Am 07.05.2025 um 21:52 schrieb Wilhelm Spiegl : > > Hi Bernd, > > could you publish a test version with the actual status? > > Thx > > Willi >

Re: [Freedos-devel]  Re: FreeDOS EDIT fork

Hi Bernd,could you publish a test version with the actual status?ThxWilli--Gesendet mit der mail.com Mail AppAm 07.05.25, 21:01 schrieb "Bernd Böckmann via Freedos-devel" lists.sourceforge.net>: I have made some changes to the FreeDOS EDIT source. EDIT 0.9a contains quite many bugs, which I find as

Re: [Freedos-devel] Svardos Editor

MS DOS Edit wasn't standard until MS DOS 5.0. We had to live with edlin before then. :D On Wed, May 7, 2025 at 11:06 AM Bernd Böckmann via Freedos-devel < [email protected]> wrote: > > > Am 07.05.2025 um 18:30 schrieb Louis Santillan via Freedos-devel < > [email protected]

Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS EDIT fork

I have made some changes to the FreeDOS EDIT source. EDIT 0.9a contains quite many bugs, which I find astonishing considering it is the default editor since a few decades. Things I have done so far: - fix IVT memory corruption resulting from a null ptr write when creating a new document - fix

Re: [Freedos-devel] Svardos Editor

> Am 07.05.2025 um 18:30 schrieb Louis Santillan via Freedos-devel > : > > Knowing that I am oso2k on BTTR, I'd go further & say that sved should become > the default editor. I think it is worth providing it as a package, as it is a) very usable on really slow machines and b) it can handl

Re: [Freedos-devel] Svardos Editor

Knowing that I am oso2k on BTTR, I'd go further & say that sved should become the default editor. It's like FED in its featherweight and features, but doesn't require a 386 (djgpp) or MS VisualC to compile. SVED uses Open Watcom 1.9 (and UPX) and is compiled with the 80